After any major disaster—especially one as shocking and unprecedented as Hurricane Melissa—people naturally reach for explanations that feel proportionate to the fear. When you hear stories like “lightning with no sound,” or “it stayed in one place then moved one direction then another,” or “there were plenty planes going in,” it can start to sound like something engineered.
But when we slow the conversation down and line up the evidence, one conclusion keeps coming back:
There’s no credible evidence that Hurricane Melissa was man-made, and the current state of weather technology does not allow humans to create, steer, or “seed” a hurricane into behaving the way people imagine.
That doesn’t mean the questions are foolish. It means the answers require a bit of atmospheric reality—because nature is already dramatic enough without us adding movie-plot physics to it.
1) First: what was Hurricane Melissa, officially?
The authoritative record for Atlantic tropical cyclones is the U.S. National Hurricane Center (NHC). Melissa’s advisories and archive are publicly available, including bulletins tracking the system’s intensity and evolution.
That matters because conspiracy claims often start by treating a storm like a rumour. But Melissa is not a rumour: it’s a fully documented cyclone, analysed using satellites, ocean data, radar, and aircraft reconnaissance, with an official advisory trail.
2) “Lightning with no sound” — how can that happen?
People often describe this as “silent lightning” or “heat lightning.” The key point is simple:
You can see lightning from much farther away than you can hear thunder. Thunder is just sound, and sound weakens with distance and can be bent away from you by the atmosphere.
A few grounded reasons you might see flashes but hear little or nothing:
- Distance: Thunder is rarely heard beyond a certain range (often quoted around ~15 km, depending on conditions).
- Atmospheric layering: Temperature profiles can refract sound upward so it never reaches you clearly.
- Wind and storm noise: In extreme weather, background roar and wind can drown out thunder even if it’s present.
And here’s the other important piece for Melissa specifically: very intense hurricanes can produce a lot of lightning—especially near the eyewall during rapid intensification. Reports around Melissa noted extraordinary lightning rates near the core.
So lightning wasn’t a “tell” that the storm was artificial. If anything, lightning in and near the eyewall is a known feature of some of the most powerful storms.
3) “A hurricane never stays in one place… then goes one way… then another”
It feels unnatural when you live through it. But meteorologically, it’s not only possible—it’s been documented many times.
A hurricane’s motion is mainly controlled by steering currents: the surrounding pattern of high and low pressure in the atmosphere. If those steering winds weaken, storms can stall. If the pressure pattern shifts, storms can turn, sometimes sharply or even loop. NASA described this clearly when explaining Hurricane Dorian’s notorious stall over the Bahamas: weak steering currents allowed it to slow dramatically and linger.
Dorian is a well-known example because people watched it “park” and devastate the same areas for hours and hours. That behaviour came from atmospheric dynamics, not human control.
So when someone says, “In all my years, I never heard of a hurricane staying in one position,” the honest reply is:
- It’s rare enough to shock communities,
- but it’s not unheard of in the science,
- and it has clear physical explanations tied to steering patterns.
4) “But the UAE makes it rain—so why couldn’t they use that tech on a hurricane?”
This is where two very different things get blended into one idea.
Cloud seeding (what it is)
Cloud seeding is a form of weather modification where aircraft or ground systems introduce particles (like silver iodide or salt) into suitable existing clouds to encourage droplets/ice crystals to grow and fall as rain. In the best cases, studies often describe modest changes—not magic.
Cloud seeding (what it isn’t)
Cloud seeding does not:
- create storms from nothing,
- steer major weather systems,
- or “dial up” a hurricane’s track like a remote-control car.
The World Meteorological Organization (WMO)—one of the most credible global voices on this—states that there is no generally accepted evidence that tropical cyclones (hurricanes/typhoons) can be modified by cloud seeding.
And NOAA has repeatedly addressed weather-modification rumours directly, including the history of past hurricane-modification experiments and why they were discontinued.
So yes—countries can attempt to enhance rainfall in specific cloud conditions. But moving from that to “therefore we can steer a hurricane” is like saying:
“Because I can light a match, I can control a volcano.”
The scale and energy involved are not in the same universe.
5) “What about seeding hurricanes? Didn’t the U.S. try that?”
They did—decades ago.
Project STORMFURY was a U.S. attempt (mid-20th century) to see if seeding could weaken hurricanes. NOAA’s own historical material explains that the research was not successful in achieving reliable hurricane modification and the program was discontinued; NOAA is not out there modifying hurricanes today.
This history is important because it shows two things at once:
- Humans have wanted to control hurricanes for a long time, and
- Even with serious scientific attention, we still couldn’t do it in a dependable way.
6) “Lots of planes were going in—could they have been seeding it?”
This is one of the most common misconceptions, because the visuals are powerful: aircraft tracks, flight-radar screenshots, talk of “missions,” and people connecting dots.
But the mainstream, documented purpose of those flights is reconnaissance and research—measuring the storm’s structure so forecasters can predict intensity and track more accurately.
NOAA explains the core mission plainly: aircraft fly to locate the storm’s center and measure central pressure and winds, among other critical observations.
And in a hurricane like Melissa, those measurements aren’t a hobby. They are life-saving inputs that improve warnings, evacuation decisions, and preparedness. The planes aren’t “feeding” the hurricane—they’re reading it.
If someone insists “the planes must be seeding,” the burden of proof is on that claim. In the real world, extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence—documents, payload details, credible insiders, instrumentation logs. “I saw a plane track” is not that.
7) “Florida hadn’t been hit for a while—so maybe they redirected it?”
Two separate ideas get tangled here:
A) “It’s been a while”
That can be true for certain stretches—hurricane landfalls are clustered and uneven across decades. But gaps happen naturally because tracks depend on changing ocean temperatures, wind shear, and large-scale pressure patterns.
B) “Therefore someone must be steering storms away”
That’s the leap—because if storm-steering technology existed at the level people imagine, it wouldn’t be hiding in rumours. It would be the most powerful strategic tool on Earth, and it would show up in physics, budgets, satellite signatures, and repeatable outcomes.
Reuters and NOAA have both dealt with similar “weather control” narratives around other storms and have pointed to the same core reality: we don’t have the capability to create or steer hurricanes.
8) So what could explain Melissa’s “unbelievable” behaviour?
When a hurricane feels unnatural, it often reflects how extreme the underlying ingredients were:
- unusually warm ocean waters (fuel),
- favourable atmospheric conditions (low wind shear),
- moisture availability,
- and steering patterns that weaken or shift.
Melissa’s documented intensity and unusual lightning activity fit the profile of a storm operating at the edge of what the Atlantic can produce—not a storm “assisted” by cloud seeding.
And that’s the sobering truth: nature is already capable of doing things that look unreal—especially as global conditions favour stronger extremes.
9) The honest bottom line
If we’re using “every piece of information we can find” responsibly, we have to prioritise the sources that are accountable, testable, and transparent:
- NHC provides the official advisory record for Melissa.
- NOAA explains what Hurricane Hunters do and directly debunks weather-modification claims.
- WMO states there’s no generally accepted evidence that tropical cyclones can be modified by cloud seeding.
- Established science education sources explain why lightning can be seen without thunder.
- NASA/WMO explain how storms can stall when steering currents collapse.
Put plainly:
Hurricane Melissa was not “man-made” in any evidentiary sense we can support. The strange features people describe—silent lightning, stalling, changing direction, lots of aircraft—each have well-understood explanations that do not require secret technology.
A final word (especially for us in the Caribbean)
When we debate “man-made hurricanes,” we risk missing the harder, more actionable conversation:
- how prepared we are for the next one,
- whether our shelters, drainage, building standards, and communication systems match today’s reality,
- and how we protect the most vulnerable when the storm doesn’t behave “normally.”
Because the real threat is not a hidden machine in the sky.
The real threat is that storms can now be so extreme that they feel impossible—and yet they still arrive.
If you want, I can rewrite this as (1) a Facebook-length post, (2) a tighter op-ed style article, or (3) a more Jamaican-voice version while keeping it respectful and not condescending.
Disclaimer:
This post is intended for public education and discussion only. It draws on publicly available scientific explanations, official meteorological sources, and established research on hurricanes and weather systems. It does not claim insider knowledge, secret information, or definitive answers beyond what is supported by credible evidence. Readers are encouraged to consult official agencies such as meteorological authorities and scientific institutions for real-time updates and technical assessments.
Discover more from Jamaica Homes News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
