- Unemployment falls to 7.7% — a record low in Jamaica’s modern economic history, below the double-digit rates that persisted through the programme years
- GDP grows 1.0% as the economy continues its moderate expansion in the post-programme era
- Public debt holds at 94.3% of GDP, sustaining the consolidation achieved when the 100% threshold was crossed in 2018
- Tourism sets new records with 2.68 million arrivals and US$3,639 million in receipts — the strongest performance in the island’s history
- Inflation rises modestly to 3.9%, remaining within the Bank of Jamaica’s target band
- The labour market improvement begins to translate, gradually, into real improvements in household living standards
The Low Watermark: Jamaica in 2019
By 2019, the Jamaica that had emerged from the programme years was beginning to look recognisably different from the Jamaica of the crisis decade. Unemployment had fallen to 7.7 per cent — the lowest rate in the country’s modern statistical history, a level that placed more Jamaicans in work than any measurement since the surveys began. Tourism was setting records that would have seemed extraordinary even a decade earlier. The debt ratio was holding below 100 per cent. These achievements did not resolve the structural questions about growth, distribution and the quality of the jobs being created. But they described a labour market and a macroeconomic environment that were, by Jamaica’s own historical standards, producing results that the adjustment had promised and had now, unmistakably, begun to deliver.
Unemployment at 7.7 Per Cent: A Record Low
Jamaica’s unemployment rate fell to 7.7 per cent in 2019 — the lowest level recorded since the Statistical Institute of Jamaica began systematic labour force surveys. The achievement was significant in its own terms: unemployment above 10 per cent had been a persistent feature of Jamaica’s labour market through the programme years and had characterised the economy for most of the period since the 2008 global financial crisis. The fall below 8 per cent represented a genuine structural improvement in the labour market’s capacity to absorb workers, driven by the sustained expansion of the services sector — tourism, BPO, financial services and retail — in an environment of improved macroeconomic stability.
The record low unemployment figure masked significant variation in the quality and security of the employment being generated. A substantial portion of new employment was informal — in micro-enterprises, personal services and the self-employment arrangements that characterise the lower end of the services economy. Informal employment provides income but not the social insurance contributions, pension accumulation, NHT contributions and regulated working conditions that formal employment provides. The growth of informal employment was a natural consequence of an economy expanding through services rather than through the structured production arrangements of manufacturing or the public sector, and it raised genuine questions about whether the declining unemployment rate was translating into the kind of employment security that could sustain household investment decisions — in housing, in children’s education, in the long-term commitments that require income predictability.
Youth unemployment, though falling in line with the headline rate, remained significantly above the national average — a structural feature of the Jamaican labour market that the improving aggregate figures could not fully obscure. Young workers entering the labour market for the first time faced the familiar challenges of a market in which employers’ hiring decisions are influenced by work history and demonstrated reliability, qualities that first-time workers cannot yet demonstrate. The skills mismatch between what Jamaica’s education and training system was producing and what the fastest-growing sectors of the economy required added a further structural dimension to the youth employment challenge that the macroeconomic improvement alone could not address. These were problems of institutional design and human capital investment that would require sustained policy attention regardless of the headline unemployment figure.
An unemployment rate of 7.7 per cent is a record — and records are made to be interrogated. Whether the jobs behind the number are sufficient in quality, security and income to constitute the economic inclusion that a generation of adjustment was supposed to deliver is a question the statistic alone cannot answer.
GDP at 1.0 Per Cent: Steady but Insufficient
Jamaica’s economy grew by 1.0 per cent in 2019 — a moderation from the 1.8 per cent of 2018 that reflected a mix of domestic and external headwinds. Globally, growth was decelerating through 2019 as trade tensions between the major economies dampened investment and reduced the impulse to international trade that had underpinned expansion in previous years. The United States economy — Jamaica’s primary trading partner and the source market for the majority of its tourists and remittances — was still growing, but at a rate that suggested the late-cycle expansion would not be sustained indefinitely. These global dynamics transmitted to Jamaica through the channels of tourism demand, remittance flows and the investment climate for the external financing that Jamaican sovereign and corporate borrowers required.
Domestically, the 1.0 per cent figure reflected the persistent structural constraints on Jamaica’s productive capacity. Energy remained expensive relative to regional competitors, though the investments in renewable generation and the natural gas transition that had been underway for several years were beginning to add capacity to the grid. Crime continued to impose direct and indirect costs on productive activity — through the security expenditures that businesses were required to maintain, the spatial constraints on investment in communities where physical safety could not be guaranteed, and the emigration of skilled workers whose options had not narrowed as quickly as those who stayed without the same choices. Infrastructure investment was proceeding, but the accumulated deficit was large enough that the improvements being made were bringing the stock closer to adequacy rather than achieving adequacy itself.
The services sector remained the primary driver of growth, consistent with the structural transformation of Jamaica’s economy that had been underway since the contraction of manufacturing and agriculture through the 1990s and 2000s. Tourism, BPO, financial services and telecommunications all contributed positively to the 2019 expansion. The goods-producing sectors — mining, agriculture and manufacturing — were broadly stable without being dynamic, performing at levels that sustained existing employment and productive capacity without generating the kind of investment-driven expansion that would have added meaningfully to the aggregate growth figure. The economy was growing; the pace at which it was growing was not yet sufficient to transform the living standards of the average Jamaican within any near-term horizon.
Debt at 94.3 Per Cent: Consolidation Holds
Jamaica’s public debt ratio was 94.3 per cent of GDP in 2019 — an almost unchanged level from the 94.4 per cent of 2018, reflecting the completion of the most rapid phase of debt reduction and the beginning of a more gradual consolidation. The marginal movement was not a policy failure; the debt reduction programme had never been designed to achieve sharp falls indefinitely, and the maintenance of the sub-100 per cent level through 2019 represented the successful embedding of the fiscal discipline that had driven the reduction from 143.9 per cent in 2012 to below par in 2018. The fiscal framework continued to target a primary surplus, and the government was honouring that commitment.
The macroeconomic framework that had sustained the debt reduction — the annual budget targets, the EPOC monitoring, the debt management operations that were reducing the interest cost of the existing stock as higher-rate legacy debt matured and was refinanced at lower rates — was functioning in 2019 without the intensity of programme-era oversight that had characterised the EFF years. The transition to autonomous fiscal management, without the quarterly review calendar that had structured the programme period, had proceeded smoothly. The institutional habits of fiscal discipline — the budget preparation process, the public spending controls, the treasury management practices — had been sufficiently embedded that they did not require an external programme to sustain them.
The government’s fiscal space was expanding, at the margin, as the debt service burden continued to decline and growth generated incremental revenues. The incremental space was being directed toward the social and capital investments that the programme years had deferred: road rehabilitation, school construction, health facility upgrading, and the transfer programmes that supported the most vulnerable households. These investments were not yet at the scale required to close the gaps that decades of constraint had accumulated. They were, however, real — funded by the fiscal consolidation that had been so costly to achieve and beginning to deliver the improved public services that the people who had borne the cost of adjustment had been promised.
Tourism: 2.68 Million Arrivals
Jamaica’s tourism sector achieved 2.68 million arrivals in 2019 and receipts of US$3,639 million — new records on both measures, and a continuation of a growth trajectory that had been essentially unbroken since 2013. The receipts figure approached US$3.7 billion, a level that would have seemed extraordinary even in the sector’s most optimistic projections at the start of the decade. The gap between the Jamaica that tourists experienced and the Jamaica in which most Jamaicans lived remained a structural feature of the industry’s model, but the scale of the foreign exchange earnings generated was now so large that its contribution to Jamaica’s balance of payments and its indirect effects on employment and domestic demand were substantial and widely distributed.
The cruise sector contributed meaningfully to the 2019 arrival figures, with Jamaica’s ports — particularly Falmouth’s purpose-built cruise pier and the facilities in Ocho Rios and Montego Bay — handling volumes that placed the island among the Caribbean’s leading cruise destinations. The economic impact of cruise arrivals was a subject of ongoing debate in Jamaican policy circles: cruise visitors spend far less per capita than stopover tourists, a large portion of their on-island spending flows through cruise-company-controlled excursion and retail operations rather than through independent Jamaican businesses, and the infrastructure investment required to handle large cruise ships is substantial. The sector’s contribution to arrival totals was real; its contribution to the income of the Jamaican economy was more modest in proportion to its share of the headline figures.
The stopover tourism product continued its quality-driven evolution in 2019. New hotel openings and the refurbishment of existing properties were adding rooms to the market at a rate that reflected investor confidence in Jamaica’s tourism trajectory, while the Jamaica Tourist Board’s marketing was increasingly targeting the higher-spending visitor segments — luxury, wellness, cultural and adventure tourism — that would improve the revenue per arrival metric even as total arrival volumes grew. The balance between volume growth and yield improvement was the central strategic question for a sector that could either continue to scale on the existing model or shift its competitive positioning toward the higher-value segments where Jamaica’s natural and cultural assets could command premium pricing.
Tourism receipts of US$3.6 billion in a year of 2.68 million arrivals represent the accumulated returns of two decades of investment in airlift, capacity and brand — and a concentration of the island’s economic future in a sector whose resilience to external disruption has never been fully tested.
Inflation at 3.9 Per Cent: Stability in the Target Band
Consumer price inflation was 3.9 per cent in 2019 — a modest increase from the 3.7 per cent of 2018, and a level that remained consistent with the Bank of Jamaica’s inflation target band. The slight uptick reflected a modest recovery in global oil prices through parts of the year, some exchange rate depreciation and the domestic demand effects of an economy that was growing and a labour market that was tightening. The Bank of Jamaica’s inflation-targeting framework managed these pressures with the standard tools of monetary policy, using the policy rate to signal its commitment to keeping inflation within the target range while remaining mindful of the credit growth that the productive sector required.
The sustained low-inflation environment of 2018 and 2019 — both years within or near the Bank’s target — was sufficiently novel in Jamaica’s monetary history to represent a structural achievement in its own right. An economy that had historically been characterised by high and volatile inflation, driven by the combination of a weak exchange rate, energy dependence and accommodating monetary policy, had produced two consecutive years of inflation within a modern target framework. The institutional maturation of the Bank of Jamaica’s monetary policy framework — the development of the inflation target, the communication infrastructure of press conferences and policy statements, the analytical capacity to assess inflation dynamics with the rigour that an explicit target demands — was a less visible but genuinely consequential change in Jamaica’s economic governance that the programme years had accelerated.
Housing: Gains in a Tightening Market
The National Housing Trust’s operating environment in 2019 was shaped by the improving economy and the labour market’s tightening. Growing formal employment meant a larger contributor base, which strengthened the Trust’s financial position and expanded the pool of workers eligible for NHT mortgages. The combination of lower interest rates, low inflation and rising formal employment improved the affordability of NHT mortgage products for contributors whose real incomes had been growing through the preceding years of low-inflation economic expansion. Demand for NHT mortgages was strong, and the Trust was processing applications at volumes that reflected the accumulated housing aspirations of a workforce that had been contributing to the institution through years of constrained lending activity.
The supply side of the housing equation remained challenging. The housing market was tightening as demand — from first-time buyers, from diaspora investors, from the expanded formal workforce now eligible for NHT mortgages — was growing faster than formal supply. The consequences were evident in the movement of property values in urban areas: land prices in and around Kingston and the major north coast towns were rising, compressing affordability for lower-income buyers and pushing the effective market price of units above the levels at which NHT concessionary mortgage rates could fully bridge the gap between what contributors could borrow and what units cost. The affordability challenge that the NHT had been designed to address was shifting with market conditions rather than narrowing.
The government’s initiatives to increase housing supply — the NHT development pipeline, the various public-private partnership arrangements for large-scale residential development, and the ongoing land titling work of the Systematic Regularisation Programme — were operating in 2019 with the improved institutional capacity that the post-programme fiscal environment was permitting. The NHT was progressing projects that the funding constraints of the programme years had deferred. The land titling work was extending formal property rights to communities where informal tenure had historically been the norm. These were incremental improvements in an environment where the structural housing deficit remained large and the pace of formal supply addition was still significantly below the pace of household formation.
The Legacy Lives On
Marcus Garvey’s vision was never merely of an economy that grew, but of a people whose economic circumstances were commensurate with their human dignity and potential. The Jamaica of 2019 — with record low unemployment, a tourism sector generating nearly US$3.7 billion in receipts, inflation within a modern central bank target and a debt ratio below 100 per cent for the second consecutive year — was, by its own historical measures, performing well. By Garvey’s more demanding standard, the question of whether the growth was distributing its benefits broadly enough, generating employment of sufficient quality and security, and building the domestic productive capacity that would sustain prosperity across generations, remained as live as it had always been.
The year 2019 closed with an economy that had emerged from its most acute fiscal crisis and was operating in conditions of macroeconomic stability that had not been seen since before the global financial crisis. The institutions built or strengthened through the programme years — the fiscal responsibility framework, the EPOC’s monitoring function, the Bank of Jamaica’s inflation-targeting architecture — were working, and the economy was responding to their stability with the investment and employment growth that the architects of the 2013 compact had projected. What the compact had not been able to guarantee — the external conditions that would determine whether the stability could be maintained — was already, somewhere on the horizon, beginning to change in ways that the Jamaica of 2019’s final months could not yet fully see.
Series note: This is Edition 22 of Marcus Garvey & The Making of Modern Jamaica — an ongoing editorial series examining Jamaica’s social, economic and built environment through an annual lens, from the birth of Marcus Garvey in 1887 to the present day. Edition 1 (1887–1998), Edition 2 (1999), Edition 3 (2000), Edition 4 (2001), Edition 5 (2002), Edition 6 (2003), Edition 7 (2004), Edition 8 (2005), Edition 9 (2006), Edition 10 (2007), Edition 11 (2008), Edition 12 (2009), Edition 13 (2010), Edition 14 (2011), Edition 15 (2012), Edition 16 (2013), Edition 17 (2014), Edition 18 (2015), Edition 19 (2016), Edition 20 (2017) and Edition 21 (2018) are available on Jamaica Homes News.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomes Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com
Support independent Jamaican journalism.
- 1Our journalists cover housing, politics and community — stories that directly affect Jamaican lives.
- 2We have no billionaire owner and no advertisers calling the shots. Every story is decided by our editors.
- 3It costs less than a cup of coffee a week, and takes less time to subscribe than it took to read this article.
Support Jamaica Homes News today.
- Save 17% compared to monthly
- All articles unlocked
- Weekly newsletter
- Priority support
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms.
