Quarterly Jamaica Windrush & Diaspora Update | Published: 3 July 2018 | Period covered: January–June 2018
Key Developments at a Glance
- Windrush scandal erupts publicly in April 2018, forcing emergency parliamentary debate.
- Theresa May apologises to twelve Caribbean leaders at CHOGM on 17 April 2018.
- Home Secretary Amber Rudd resigns on 29 April after misleading parliament on deportation targets.
- Government announces Windrush Compensation Scheme and Task Force in April and May 2018.
- Sajid Javid appointed new Home Secretary — first British Asian to hold the role.
- 70th anniversary of HMT Empire Windrush’s arrival marked on 22 June 2018 with national reflection.
No quarter in the modern history of the Jamaican and Caribbean diaspora in Britain has carried the weight of the first six months of 2018. What began as a trickle of investigative reporting in the Guardian — individual stories of Caribbean-born British residents denied NHS treatment, sacked from long-held jobs, or told they had no right to live in the country they had called home for fifty years — became, by April, a raging torrent that swept away a Home Secretary, humiliated a Prime Minister, and forced a nation to confront the systematic cruelty it had inflicted on the generation that rebuilt it after the Second World War.
The Guardian Investigation: Amelia Gentleman Speaks for the Silenced
The immediate trigger was a sequence of investigations by the Guardian’s Amelia Gentleman, whose reporting from late 2017 and into early 2018 had systematically documented case after case of Commonwealth citizens being denied their rights in the United Kingdom. By March and April 2018, the stories had achieved a critical mass that parliament could no longer ignore. MPs from across the House began demanding answers. Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott pressed the government at every opportunity. Caribbean High Commissioners in London were meeting urgently to coordinate a response.
The cases Gentleman described were devastating in their particularity. Hubert Howard, who came from Jamaica in 1960, had lived in Britain for fifty-seven years and was detained by immigration enforcement. Paulette Wilson, who arrived from Jamaica aged ten, was put in Yarl’s Wood immigration detention centre and handed removal directions to a country she had not seen in over fifty years. Albert Thompson, who came from Jamaica in 1973, was denied cancer treatment by the NHS because he could not prove his right to be in the United Kingdom. These were not anomalies. They were the predictable outcome of a deliberate policy.
CHOGM: An Apology on the World Stage
The timing of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting, held in London from 16–20 April 2018, proved to be a moment of acute embarrassment for the British government. Caribbean leaders — twelve of them, representing the nations whose people had come to Britain in the postwar decades — arrived to find the story of their citizens’ mistreatment dominating the British press. Jamaica’s Prime Minister Andrew Holness, Barbados’s Prime Minister Mia Mottley, Trinidad’s Prime Minister Keith Rowley and others arrived at Marlborough House for a bilateral summit with Theresa May that no one had expected to be so charged.
May apologised on 17 April. She described what had happened to members of the Windrush generation as “absolutely appalling” and expressed “genuine and deep” regret. The Caribbean leaders accepted the apology with measured grace while making clear that words alone were insufficient. Holness, who described the situation as a matter of profound concern for Jamaica, pressed for concrete commitments on documentation, compensation, and the treatment of future cases. CARICOM Secretary-General Irwin LaRocque warned that the incident had damaged trust between the Caribbean and the United Kingdom in ways that would take time to repair.
In the press gallery at Marlborough House and across the Caribbean media, the images of a British Prime Minister apologising to a row of Caribbean heads of government for a scandal caused by her own Home Office — when she herself had been Home Secretary from 2010 to 2016 — were not lost on observers. The fact that May had personally championed the hostile environment policies whose inevitable outcome now stood exposed lent the apology a heavily freighted irony.
Amber Rudd’s Resignation: Accountability at the Top
The political cost of the Windrush scandal was swiftly extracted. Amber Rudd, who had been Home Secretary since July 2016, resigned on 29 April 2018 after it emerged that she had told the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee that the Home Office did not set targets for removing illegal immigrants — a claim contradicted by a leaked internal document showing that the department did indeed operate targets for enforced removals. She wrote in her resignation letter that she had “inadvertently misled” parliament.
Her successor, Sajid Javid, was appointed the same day. Javid — the son of Pakistani immigrants, the first British Asian to hold the office of Home Secretary — struck a notably different tone from the outset. In his first statement to the Commons, he spoke of his parents’ journey to Britain and of his personal understanding of what it meant to be told that you did not belong. He committed to acting with urgency on the Windrush cases, to establishing a Task Force to help affected individuals, and to designing a compensation scheme. The Caribbean community, bruised and wary, offered a cautious welcome.
The Task Force, the Compensation Pledge, and Urgent Action
In the weeks following Rudd’s resignation, the government moved quickly to contain the political and humanitarian damage. The Windrush Task Force was established within the Home Office to help affected individuals obtain documentation confirming their right to remain in the UK, free of charge. A dedicated helpline was opened. Government ministers visited community organisations and church groups to listen to affected individuals.
On 23 April, the government announced that a Windrush Compensation Scheme would be established, with Javid promising that it would be “generous and swift.” The details of the scheme were not immediately available — its design would take months of consultation — but the commitment was made at the highest level. Parliament debated the issue repeatedly through May and June, with cross-party consensus that what had happened represented an institutional failure of the gravest kind.
Diane Abbott, Harriet Harman, and David Lammy led parliamentary pressure on the government. Lammy — who had been among the most vocal critics and whose own parents belonged to the Windrush generation — called the scandal a “shameful episode” that reflected a “Brexit environment” of hostility to immigration. He pressed for a public inquiry, a call that the government resisted in favour of the Lessons Learned Review that would later be announced under Wendy Williams.
The 70th Anniversary: Remembrance in the Shadow of Scandal
On 22 June 2018 — the 70th anniversary of HMT Empire Windrush’s arrival at Tilbury Docks — Britain marked the occasion with a mixture of celebration, grief and anger that reflected the extraordinary events of the preceding months. For the communities gathered at events across London, Birmingham, Bristol and beyond, the anniversary was inseparable from the scandal: the same generation being honoured was the generation that had been wronged.
At Westminster, a debate was held in the House of Commons to mark the anniversary. In Brixton, where so many of the Windrush generation had made their homes, community events drew thousands. At the National Maritime Museum, an exhibition was launched documenting the journey of the Empire Windrush and its passengers. In Jamaica, the government of Prime Minister Holness held a commemoration in Kingston, acknowledging the sacrifice and contribution of those who had left the island to build new lives in Britain — and the injustice done to them.
For many survivors, the anniversary was also an occasion of mourning: for members of their generation who had been wrongfully deported and had since died without seeing justice; for those who had suffered years of harassment and loss; and for what might have been had the hostile environment never been created in the first place. The 70th anniversary of Windrush arrived not as a moment of uncomplicated celebration, but as a national reckoning long overdue.
Jamaica’s Response and the Diplomatic Dimension
Jamaica’s diplomatic response to the Windrush scandal has been measured but firm. The Jamaica High Commission in London has been deluged with calls from Jamaicans seeking assistance, clarification about their status, or help navigating the newly announced Task Force and compensation processes. The commission has provided what consular support it can and has coordinated closely with the government in Kingston.
Prime Minister Holness, who attended CHOGM and held bilateral discussions with May, has since engaged with Javid and other ministers in pressing for acceleration of the remediation process. Jamaica has also been active within CARICOM in shaping the collective Caribbean response, insisting that the scandal be treated not as a closed chapter following the apology but as an ongoing crisis requiring sustained attention and concrete results. As this quarter closes, Jamaicans on both sides of the Atlantic are watching to see whether Britain’s response proves equal to the scale of the wrong committed.
Sources: Jamaica Information Service; The Gleaner; Jamaica Observer; Caribbean National Weekly; The Guardian (Amelia Gentleman); BBC News; Reuters; AP; Home Office (UK); UK Parliament Hansard; CARICOM Secretariat; Jamaica High Commission London; National Maritime Museum; Windrush Justice Campaign; Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomes Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com
Support independent Jamaican journalism.
- 1Our journalists cover housing, politics and community — stories that directly affect Jamaican lives.
- 2We have no billionaire owner and no advertisers calling the shots. Every story is decided by our editors.
- 3It costs less than a cup of coffee a week, and takes less time to subscribe than it took to read this article.
Support Jamaica Homes News today.
- Save 17% compared to monthly
- All articles unlocked
- Weekly newsletter
- Priority support
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms.
