One Seat, One Programme: Andrew Holness Wins Jamaica’s Closest Election and Inherits an Economy Mid-Transformation

On the night of February 25, 2016, Jamaica’s voters delivered the closest general election result in the island’s modern history, handing the Jamaica Labour Party a majority of exactly one parliamentary seat over the People’s National Party. Andrew Holness, at 43, became Prime Minister of a country in the middle of an IMF programme it had not written, presiding over a recovery it had not started, and governing with a margin so thin that a single by-election loss would return him to opposition.

• The JLP won 32 of 63 parliamentary seats on February 25, 2016, ending the PNP’s four-year tenure by the narrowest possible margin
• Andrew Holness was sworn in as Prime Minister on February 29, the first Jamaican PM to take office on a leap day
• The new government immediately confirmed it would maintain and complete the IMF Extended Fund Facility programme
• IMF mission teams arrived in Kingston within weeks of the election to brief incoming ministers on programme commitments
• The JLP’s signature campaign pledge — income tax relief for workers earning below J$1.5 million annually — was reiterated as a first-term priority
• Tourism arrivals for Q1 2016 remained strong, providing an early foreign exchange cushion for the new administration

The counting rooms closed late on election night, and when the final tallies emerged, Jamaica had produced one of the most precisely divided democratic verdicts in Caribbean history. The Jamaica Labour Party won 32 of the 63 seats in the House of Representatives; the People’s National Party won 31. The popular vote was effectively tied. In a first-past-the-post Westminster system, a margin of one seat is a parliamentary majority, but it is also a warning: govern carefully, because there is no room for defection, illness, or scandal before the arithmetic turns against you.

Andrew Holness was sworn into office on February 29, 2016 — a leap day, a detail that political commentators found either auspicious or merely calendrically unusual. At 43, he was among the youngest prime ministers in Jamaica’s history, a technocratic and quietly methodical politician who had first led the JLP to defeat in 2011 and had spent four years rebuilding the party’s credibility on economic management. His first priority, stated within hours of the result being confirmed, was to assure the financial markets, the International Monetary Fund, and Jamaica’s bilateral creditors that the Extended Fund Facility programme — approved in May 2013 and running for four years — would be completed without interruption.

The assurance was politically necessary and economically sensible. Jamaica’s access to multilateral financing from the IMF, the World Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank was contingent on continued programme compliance. The concessional lending terms available under the programme — which helped roll over legacy debt at affordable rates — would disappear the moment Jamaica stepped off the reform path. Holness and his incoming Finance Minister, Audley Shaw, were given the IMF’s programme documentation within their first days in office, and the Fund sent a technical team to Kingston in March to brief the new economic team on the performance criteria and structural benchmarks that the incoming government had just implicitly inherited.

The political inheritance was not without complexity. The PNP had designed the programme, negotiated its terms, and managed its execution through twelve consecutive quarterly reviews without a single waiver. The JLP was now being asked to deliver the programme’s final year — including the completion of structural reforms that the PNP had initiated — while simultaneously delivering on its own campaign commitments. The most politically charged of these was the income tax threshold promise: a pledge to raise the minimum income below which no income tax was payable to J$1.5 million annually, a measure that would benefit a broad swathe of the Jamaican workforce but that carried a cost the Ministry of Finance would need to find without breaching the primary surplus target.

The economy Holness inherited was, on the headline numbers, in better shape than the one his party had lost in 2011. Debt had fallen from above 143 per cent of GDP to approximately 124 per cent. Unemployment had declined from above 14 per cent to around 12 per cent. The Bank of Jamaica‘s policy rate had been reduced substantially as inflation came under control. Tourism was delivering record arrival numbers for the fourth consecutive year, providing a stream of foreign exchange that was supporting the current account and the exchange rate. The Planning Institute of Jamaica was projecting GDP growth of approximately 1.5 per cent for 2016 — the strongest since before the global financial crisis.

The first quarter of 2016 passed in a blur of transition activity, IMF briefings, and early budget preparation. Shaw, returning to the finance portfolio he had occupied during the JLP’s last period in government from 2007 to 2011, moved quickly to signal continuity. The Economic Programme Oversight Committee — the independent watchdog created under the PNP’s Partnership for Jamaica Agreement — was retained. The Fiscal Responsibility Framework legislation, which embedded programme disciplines into statute, remained on the books. The incoming government was not dismantling its predecessor’s architecture; it was taking occupation of it and deciding how to furnish the remaining rooms.

For ordinary Jamaicans, the change in government produced an immediate shift in political temperature without an immediate change in economic reality. Prices in the shops were what they had been before the election. Roads in most parishes remained in the same state of repair — or disrepair — as they had been under the PNP. The promise of income tax relief, while welcomed, would take months to design and legislate. What had changed was the political direction: Jamaica was now governed by a party whose instincts leaned toward private sector-led growth and reducing the burden of government on individuals and businesses. Whether those instincts would produce a different economic outcome than the PNP’s more statist approach was a question that the remaining fourteen months of the IMF programme would begin to answer.

What This Means

The 2016 election result is, in economic terms, a test of institutional resilience. Jamaica designed and executed a difficult fiscal reform programme under one government, then transferred that programme — intact — to its political opponents. That the transfer happened smoothly, with both parties publicly committed to the same IMF framework, is a significant demonstration of the maturity that Jamaican economic policy-making had acquired over the four years of the EFF. The IMF’s model of programme ownership — which works only when a government internalises the reform goals rather than implementing them under duress — was now being tested under a new ownership structure. The early signals from the Holness government were encouraging. But the income tax threshold promise, if poorly designed, could create a fiscal hole that the programme’s arithmetic cannot absorb. The next budget would reveal which priority — reform continuity or campaign delivery — would prevail when the two came into conflict.

The Road Ahead

With the IMF programme running until May 2017 and a parliamentary majority of one, the Holness government operates in a context of constrained choices. The budget for 2016-17, due in late March, must honour the primary surplus target that was agreed with the Fund while beginning to deliver the income tax threshold relief that the JLP promised voters. It must also signal to the market that the new government is a reliable steward of the fiscal framework rather than a political actor seeking to unpick its predecessor’s work. The Statistical Institute of Jamaica‘s next GDP reading will be scrutinised by the IMF and markets alike. If growth comes in close to the projected 1.5 per cent, the argument for continued programme compliance will be self-reinforcing: discipline is delivering results. If growth disappoints, the pressure for stimulus will test the government’s commitment to the targets it has just inherited. Jamaica has navigated three years of that pressure successfully. The fourth year will be managed by different hands, under different political constraints, with the same fundamental challenge.

Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomes Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com