- The Limitation of Actions Act sets the period after which a squatter’s occupation can mature into a legal claim against registered land
- Fraudsters manufacture evidence of occupation — false utility bills, witness statements, and photographs — to support spurious adverse possession claims
- A landowner who takes timely action to remove squatters interrupts the limitation period and prevents an adverse possession claim from maturing
- The NLA can register an adverse possessor’s title after the limitation period, making vigilance essential for absent landowners
- Landowners should inspect their property regularly and act immediately if they discover unauthorised occupation
The doctrine of adverse possession allows a person who has been in open, continuous, and exclusive occupation of land without the owner’s permission for the period prescribed by the Limitation of Actions Act to extinguish the owner’s title and acquire a right to the land themselves. While the doctrine has a legitimate purpose — ensuring that land is not left unused and that long-established occupation is eventually recognised — it has been abused by persons who seek to use manufactured or exaggerated evidence of occupation to make claims against land to which they have no genuine historical connection. The fraud typically involves a claimant who has recently entered or fenced a portion of land assembling a dossier of false evidence — backdated utility applications, false statutory declarations from complicit witnesses, photographs taken to suggest long-established use — and presenting this to the NLA or a court as proof of the limitation period having run. Where the true owner is absent, elderly, or unaware of the claim, the fraud may succeed before it is detected.
How Landowners Can Interrupt and Defeat Adverse Possession Claims
The most effective protection against adverse possession is for landowners to maintain regular contact with their land, inspect it periodically, and take immediate action when unauthorised occupation is discovered. Any act by the true owner that acknowledges the occupation and asserts their ownership — such as serving a notice to quit, commencing possession proceedings, or obtaining a court order — interrupts the limitation period and restarts the clock. A landowner who receives notice of an adverse possession application at the NLA has a defined period in which to file an objection and produce evidence of their own title and the fraudulent nature of the claimant’s account. This objection triggers an investigation process and, in contested cases, a hearing at which both parties can present evidence. The standard of evidence required to make out a fraudulent adverse possession claim is not always high if the true owner has left no documentary trail of engagement with their land, which is why regular inspection and documented visits are so important for absent landowners.
Caveats and Proactive Title Protection
Landowners who are concerned about the vulnerability of their unoccupied land to adverse possession claims should lodge a caveat at the NLA to ensure that any application affecting the title triggers a notification. While a caveat does not prevent an adverse possession application from being filed, it ensures that the NLA must notify the caveator before processing any dealing, giving them the opportunity to respond. Landowners should also consider whether their land is sufficiently secured against entry — fencing, signage, and periodic occupation are all evidence of the owner’s continuing assertion of their rights that makes it harder for a squatter to establish the open and unchallenged occupation required for adverse possession. Any landowner who discovers that an adverse possession application has been made against their title should seek immediate legal advice from an attorney on the GLC’s register at generallegalcouncil.org and should not delay in filing their objection.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomes Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com
Support independent Jamaican journalism.
- 1Our journalists cover housing, politics and community — stories that directly affect Jamaican lives.
- 2We have no billionaire owner and no advertisers calling the shots. Every story is decided by our editors.
- 3It costs less than a cup of coffee a week, and takes less time to subscribe than it took to read this article.
Support Jamaica Homes News today.
- Save 17% compared to monthly
- All articles unlocked
- Weekly newsletter
- Priority support
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms.
