Briefing
- JaBBEM has filed or is preparing actions at five contested beach sites across Jamaica.
- All cases rest on prescription: 12+ years of open, continuous public use creates a legal right.
- Bob Marley Beach and Little Dunn’s River are the two most advanced cases in the current litigation.
- A successful prescription ruling would set a precedent affecting dozens of other disputed sites.
- JaBBEM founder Dr Devon Taylor calls the campaign a constitutional, not merely legal, argument.
Dr Devon Taylor did not set out to become the most consequential coastal rights advocate in Jamaica’s history. He is, by training and profession, a physician. He became, by circumstance and conviction, the driving force behind a legal campaign that has put Jamaica’s beach access question before the courts in a way that no previous effort had managed. The Jamaica Beach Birthright Environmental Movement, which he founded and leads, has made a specific strategic choice: to argue not for policy change through parliament, but for legal rights through litigation, and to build those arguments on the oldest applicable statute in Jamaica’s legal system.
The Prescription Act of 1882 was inherited from English common law at the time of the codification of Jamaican statute. It provides that a right exercised openly, without force, without permission, and without interruption for a period of twelve years may be established as a legal right enforceable against the owner of the land over which it has been exercised. JaBBEM’s legal theory is that at each of the five beach sites where it is mounting or preparing actions, the Jamaican public has used the beach in exactly these terms for periods far exceeding twelve years — decades or generations in most cases — and that this use has generated a prescriptive right that survives the private acquisition of the adjacent land.
The Two Lead Cases
Bob Marley Beach in St Ann is JaBBEM’s most prominent case, partly because of the name and the cultural resonance it carries, and partly because the facts of the site’s historical use are well-documented and undisputed. The beach was publicly accessible for decades before it was acquired by a development entity that then moved to restrict and commercialise access. JaBBEM’s legal action seeks a declaration of prescriptive public right and an injunction against further restriction. The case has been through multiple procedural stages, including a significant injunction that was later lifted pending the substantive hearing.
Little Dunn’s River in St Ann — distinct from the famous Dunn’s River Falls — is JaBBEM’s second lead case. The site was historically a freely accessible community beach that was enclosed and converted to a commercial attraction. JaBBEM’s action argues that the enclosure was unlawful given the prior history of free public use. Both cases are active in the court system. Neither has yet reached a final substantive ruling.
Why Prescription, Not Policy
JaBBEM’s choice to pursue litigation rather than lobbying reflects a considered strategic judgement about where leverage exists. Parliament could, in principle, amend the Beach Control Act to create stronger public access protections. It has not done so, despite decades of advocacy. The courts, by contrast, are bound to apply the law as it exists. If the Prescription Act means what JaBBEM argues it means, a court is obliged to give effect to that meaning regardless of the political inconvenience to development interests or the government.
The constitutional dimension that Taylor emphasises is this: the beach is not merely a recreational amenity. For many Jamaicans, access to the coast is an economic necessity, a cultural inheritance, and — he argues — a component of the dignity and freedom that Jamaica’s Constitution guarantees. Framing beach access in constitutional terms elevates it from a property dispute to a human rights question, and opens routes of legal argument that a pure prescription claim would not.
What a Win Would Mean
A successful prescription ruling in either the Bob Marley Beach or Little Dunn’s River case would establish that the legal framework JaBBEM is applying works as its lawyers argue. It would not automatically restore all other disputed beaches, because each site would require its own proceedings with its own evidence of historical use. But it would establish a precedent that community groups at dozens of other contested sites across Jamaica could invoke in their own legal proceedings — or in negotiations with developers and landowners who would now know that litigation was a viable threat rather than a legal long shot.
The stakes in these cases extend well beyond the beaches themselves. They are, as Taylor has described them, a test of whether Jamaica’s legal system can be made to work for ordinary Jamaicans against well-resourced interests — and of what kind of coast Jamaica intends to have in the decades to come.
Related: Property Market Analysis | Latest Jamaica News
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com
Visit our YouTube Community ↗