A Union Leader Says NHT Rate Cuts Are Being Used as a Goodie Bag

• Holness cut NHT rates for teachers, nurses, security forces
• A union leader calls it politically selective, not merit-based
• He says successive governments have tinkered with NHT
• The critique targets who benefits, not whether rates should fall

Prime Minister Andrew Holness announced during the 2026-27 Budget Debate that, effective July 1, teachers, nurses, firefighters and members of the security and defence forces would receive mortgage interest rate reductions based on length of service, one percent for five to ten years, two percent for ten years or more, alongside a doubled reservation of scheme units for buyers under 35 and a new $2 million deposit advance for open-market purchases.

John Levy, general secretary of the Union of Clerical, Administrative and Supervisory Employees, offered a pointed structural critique rather than opposing the cuts outright. The NHT has been used by governments over these years as a tool to satisfy a segment of the marketplace who they, maybe, figure, at a particular moment, they need to do something for, Levy told the Gleaner. I am not fond of those kinds of set ups. Merit is what should determine how people receive benefits.

Levy’s objection is narrower than it might first sound: he is not arguing NHT rates shouldn’t fall, or that essential workers don’t deserve support. His point is that successive administrations selecting which occupational groups get preferential treatment, teachers and nurses this cycle, a different group next time, turns a national housing fund into a political instrument responsive to whichever constituency a government currently wants to court, rather than a programme allocating benefit by a consistent, merit-based standard applied evenly to all contributors.

The critique lands at an interesting moment politically. Opposition Leader Mark Golding had separately proposed ending the annual extraction of $11.4 billion from the NHT to fund general government budget support, redirecting that money into affordable housing construction instead, alongside his own promise of enhanced NHT access specifically for teachers. Both major parties, in other words, have repeatedly proposed occupation-targeted NHT benefits as a policy tool, which is precisely the pattern Levy’s critique is aimed at, regardless of which party happens to be making the specific offer in a given budget cycle.

Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com