There are sites on which one can build almost anything, and then there are sites that insist upon an argument.
Richmond Hill belongs emphatically to the latter group.
From its elevated position above Montego Bay, the land looks across a city that has spent much of its modern life negotiating contradictions. Montego Bay is at once a tourism capital and a working Jamaican city; a place of private resorts and public streets, arriving passengers and permanent residents, hillside homes and crowded commercial corridors.
Now an extensive new development is taking shape above it.
Richmond Hill Club, being developed by Jarran Development Company Limited, has been described as a “city within the city”. Plans presented publicly combine detached villas, townhouses, apartments, resort condominiums, restaurants, recreation, wellness facilities and landscaped open space.
It is an ambitious proposition. But cities, even miniature ones, cannot be created by installing enough amenities and drawing a boundary around them. They emerge through movement, encounter, memory and the unpredictable business of people sharing space.
That is what makes Richmond Hill Club more interesting than its swimming pools or its sea views. The development is not merely adding buildings to a hillside. It is attempting to replace, reinterpret and perhaps inherit a place already embedded in Montego Bay’s collective memory.
A hill carrying more than its buildings
The site was formerly occupied by the Richmond Hill Inn, a Montego Bay landmark whose history stretched back more than two centuries. The inn became known as a venue for weddings, graduation celebrations, dinners and family occasions, as well as for its expansive view over the city.
It also housed a significant private collection of work by the Jamaican painter Barrington Watson.
A fire in December 2019 caused extensive destruction at the property. At the time, Jamaica’s Ministry of Tourism described Richmond Hill as an integral part of Montego Bay’s history for more than 200 years. The loss was therefore larger than that of an operating hotel. It removed one of the city’s familiar rooms: a place in which private milestones had been set against a public landscape.
That history places an unusual responsibility upon what follows.
The most successful developments on important sites do not necessarily recreate what was there before. Architecture is not historical fancy dress, and a replica great house would not automatically preserve the life of the old inn. But a new development should understand what made its predecessor matter.
Richmond Hill was not remembered simply because it stood on expensive land. It was remembered because people went there, celebrated there and looked back at their city from there.
The question, then, is whether the new Richmond Hill will preserve some of that civic generosity or become primarily a private outlook available to those who can afford admission.
Architecture drawn around the view
The published rendering presents a composition of broad, rounded buildings stepping across the hillside. Horizontal balcony bands wrap the taller residential towers, while planted rooftops, terraces and curved edges soften what would otherwise be a considerable mass of concrete, glass and steel.
These are images of the intended development rather than photographs of completed buildings. Landscaped terraces, mature palms and illuminated interiors belong, for now, to the architecture of expectation.
Nevertheless, the design intentions are clear.
The buildings appear to borrow their geometry from the contours of the hill. Their curved façades avoid the bluntness of conventional rectangular apartment blocks and allow more rooms to turn towards the harbour, sea and surrounding mountains. Deep balconies should also provide shade, an architectural necessity in this climate rather than a decorative indulgence.
The repeated horizontal lines give the towers something of the appearance of large ocean liners held permanently above the port. It is an oddly fitting image for Montego Bay: vessels of private accommodation facing the actual cruise ships below.
At ground level, substantial podium structures appear to absorb parking, circulation and shared facilities. This may help separate vehicles from some pedestrian areas, but podium developments carry their own risk. They can create inward-looking islands in which the attractive life happens above, while the street is left with ramps, retaining walls and service entrances.
On a steep Jamaican hillside, engineering inevitably becomes architecture. Drainage, slope stability, retaining structures, emergency access and the treatment of stormwater will matter just as much as the elegant balcony lines shown in the rendering. The beauty of a hill is also the source of its technical difficulty.
A development of this scale must therefore be judged not only by how it meets the sky, but by how carefully it meets the ground.
Three developments occupying one address
The publicly presented plans divide Richmond Hill Club into three broad components: resort accommodation, apartment living and lower-density housing.
The initial residential programme includes 54 homes, comprising 24 detached villas and 30 semi-detached townhouses. Twenty-four homes are included in the phase currently under construction, with completion of the three-bedroom detached houses reportedly targeted for the middle of 2027.
These residences are planned with 12-kilowatt solar systems, battery storage, inverters, solar water heating and ceiling-mounted air conditioning. A communal water-storage system is also proposed, while individual tanks and private pools may be available on suitable lots.
Those details are especially relevant in Jamaica. Solar generation, stored water and energy resilience are no longer exotic additions to an architectural brochure. They are increasingly part of what makes a home practical, financeable and tolerable during interruptions in public services.
A separate apartment component is expected to contain 202 one-, two- and three-bedroom units within twin residential towers. Reported plans include swimming areas, terraces, gazebos, a health and wellness centre and a bridge connecting the structures.
There are also plans for 120 resort condominium units. These would be privately owned but operated under a hospitality or branded-residence arrangement by a management company. At the time of the project’s public presentation, no final operator had been announced.
That distinction matters. A managed resort condominium is not quite a conventional home and not quite a hotel room. Its success can depend on management charges, occupancy, maintenance standards, rental restrictions and the precise rights retained by individual owners. Those details are less visually exciting than a rooftop restaurant, but considerably more important to anyone considering ownership.
The numbers require clarification
There is one issue that should not be disguised by polished renderings.
Published reporting describes Richmond Hill Club as containing 526 residences in addition to, or possibly including, 120 condominiums. Yet the components publicly itemised so far do not appear to reconcile neatly with that figure.
The stated 54 villas and townhouses, 202 apartments and 120 resort condominiums produce a total of 376 units. If the development is ultimately intended to contain 526 residences, approximately 150 units remain unexplained in the publicly reported breakdown. If the condominiums sit outside the 526 figure, the discrepancy takes another form.
This may simply reflect later phases that have not yet been described, or different uses of the words “units”, “rooms” and “residences”. But on a project of this scale, the distinction is material. It affects density, traffic, infrastructure, water demand, waste handling and the lived character of the development.
A project promoted as a community should ultimately be understandable as one.
The same scrutiny applies to the reported provision of approximately 700 parking spaces for the condominium and apartment areas. Parking is necessary, but 700 vehicles can exert a profound influence on access roads and surrounding neighbourhoods. Proximity on a map does not always translate into an easy journey on a working day in Montego Bay.
Low density is not only a calculation
The development team has presented the apartment and condominium portion as relatively low density, noting that planning provisions could permit considerably more rooms on the nine-acre area.
That may be mathematically correct, but density is not experienced as a planning ratio.
People experience it while waiting to enter a road, looking for shade, hearing generators, crossing a car park or attempting to walk somewhere that appears tantalisingly close. A development may contain fewer units than legally permitted and still feel intensely urban if its buildings, traffic and public spaces are poorly arranged.
Conversely, a tall building can feel surprisingly humane when it releases land for gardens, frames useful communal space and allows daily needs to be met without another car journey.
Richmond Hill Club reportedly sets aside roughly six acres across several areas for planting and green space. The eventual value of that provision will depend on whether these become connected, usable landscapes or decorative intervals between buildings. A lawn beside a driveway is green, certainly, but it is not necessarily a park.
A relationship with the city below
The development’s location is one of its strongest assets. Richmond Hill rises above downtown Montego Bay, within comparatively short distances of Sam Sharpe Square, Harmony Beach Park, Doctor’s Cave Beach and Sangster International Airport.
Sam Sharpe Square is not simply another nearby attraction. Renamed in 1976 in honour of National Hero Samuel Sharpe, it occupies a central place in the history and civic identity of Montego Bay. Richmond Hill therefore overlooks both the tourism machinery of the modern city and the ground on which some of Jamaica’s most consequential history is remembered.
That makes the phrase “city within the city” slightly uncomfortable.
At its best, it could describe a mixed neighbourhood where people live, dine, exercise and meet without depending upon long daily journeys. At its worst, it could suggest an enclave able to enjoy Montego Bay as scenery while remaining detached from its civic life.
The proposed public access to selected restaurants and entertainment areas may help resist that isolation. Yet access governed by reservations and membership remains different from genuinely public space. The test will be whether Montego Bay residents come to regard the development as part of their city, rather than an impressive object hovering above it.
What the hill will eventually reveal
Richmond Hill Club is unquestionably substantial, and its architecture aims for visual drama. The curved towers, planted roofs and layered terraces have been composed to make the most of a remarkable site.
But a view cannot, by itself, make a community.
The enduring quality of Richmond Hill will depend on matters that rarely dominate a rendering: the comfort of its shaded walkways, the management of rainwater, the durability of its finishes, the burden placed on surrounding roads, the honesty of its ownership arrangements and the degree to which its cultural spaces feel genuinely connected to Montego Bay.
There is also the matter of memory. The former Richmond Hill Inn survived in people’s minds because important portions of their lives happened there. No architect can specify that kind of affection, and no developer can install it before completion.
It must accumulate slowly.
If the new Richmond Hill can combine resilient homes, thoughtful landscaping, accessible cultural life and a respectful relationship with the city below, it may become more than an elevated collection of private addresses. It may acquire a public meaning of its own.
Until then, it remains an arresting proposition on a historic hill: part construction site, part architectural promise and part test of what Montego Bay expects from the places now reshaping its skyline.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com
Support independent Jamaican journalism.
- 1Our journalists cover housing, politics and community — stories that directly affect Jamaican lives.
- 2We have no billionaire owner and no advertisers calling the shots. Every story is decided by our editors.
- 3It costs less than a cup of coffee a week, and takes less time to subscribe than it took to read this article.
Support Jamaica Homes News today.
- Save 17% compared to monthly
- All articles unlocked
- Weekly newsletter
- Priority support
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms.


Visit our YouTube Community ↗