The first full quarter of life after Jamaica’s IMF Extended Fund Facility posed the question that economists had long debated: would the fiscal discipline of the programme years prove self-sustaining when the external accountability of quarterly reviews was replaced by the lighter touch of a precautionary arrangement? The preliminary answer from the second quarter of 2017 was cautiously encouraging. The primary surplus held, debt continued its decline, and the economy kept growing — modestly, but measurably.
- The primary surplus for Q2 2017 remained on track with precautionary SBA targets, demonstrating post-EFF fiscal resilience
- GDP growth for the first half of 2017 continued at approximately 0.5–0.7%, with construction and mining dragging and services supporting
- Tourism delivered another record-pace spring season, with the JTB reporting continued year-on-year growth in stop-over arrivals
- Jamaica’s Doing Business ranking improved materially, rising in the World Bank’s assessment of business environment quality
- The Ministry of Finance outlined plans for a new Jamaica Development Infrastructure Programme to address long-deferred capital expenditure
- Debt fell below 110% of GDP for the first time since 2005, as the trajectory established under the EFF continued undisturbed
The transition from Jamaica’s Extended Fund Facility to the precautionary Stand-By Arrangement had, in institutional terms, been smooth. The quarterly review cycle continued; the Economic Programme Oversight Committee continued its independent assessments; the primary surplus target, though slightly reduced from the demanding 7.5 per cent set under the EFF, remained a binding constraint on fiscal discretion. In the second quarter of 2017, the Ministry of Finance reported that the primary surplus was tracking in line with the SBA’s programme targets — a performance that earned the IMF’s endorsement in its second review of the arrangement and allowed Jamaica to maintain the creditor confidence that had been so painfully acquired over four years of adjustment.
The broader economy presented a picture of moderate growth sustained by a narrow but increasingly reliable set of drivers. The Planning Institute of Jamaica reported GDP growth of approximately 0.5 to 0.7 per cent for the first half of 2017, below the 2016 pace but above the contraction and near-stagnation of 2012 and 2013. The construction sector, which had been a significant contributor to growth during the hotel investment cycle of 2014 to 2016, was normalising as major projects completed. Mining — primarily bauxite and alumina — remained affected by the long-term structural challenges of the global aluminium market. Services, led by tourism and financial intermediation, continued to carry the growth load.
Tourism, ever reliable, delivered another strong spring quarter. The Jamaica Tourist Board reported that stop-over arrivals for Q2 2017 were running above the equivalent period of 2016, suggesting that the full year would deliver an eighth consecutive annual record — a run of consistency unprecedented in the island’s tourism history. The north coast product was performing strongly, but growth was also emerging from the south coast and Kingston as the government promoted culinary tourism and cultural experiences as complements to the beach-and-all-inclusive product that had dominated Jamaica’s tourism offer for decades.
The World Bank’s Doing Business assessment, released in the second quarter, showed Jamaica continuing an upward trajectory in its ranking of business environment quality. The island had invested significantly in reducing the time and cost of business registration, improving access to credit information, and strengthening contract enforcement mechanisms — all areas that the IMF programme had identified as structural bottlenecks. The improved ranking was not merely a statistical achievement; it reflected genuine improvements in the experience of businesses seeking to operate formally in the Jamaican economy, and it was beginning to attract investment flows from operators who had previously viewed Jamaica’s regulatory environment as too burdensome to navigate.
The Ministry of Finance outlined a new Jamaica Development Infrastructure Programme designed to address the road rehabilitation, drainage, and social infrastructure investment that had been deferred during the tight budget years of 2013 to 2016. The programme was to be funded through a combination of the accumulated primary surplus space, multilateral lending from the World Bank and IDB at concessional rates, and targeted domestic borrowing. The scale of the deferred investment need was significant: roads across the island had deteriorated markedly during the fiscal consolidation period, and the political pressure to address infrastructure visible to voters was intense. The challenge was to increase capital spending at a pace that the economy could absorb without triggering inflation, and at a scale that did not violate the primary surplus targets embedded in the SBA.
Public debt crossed below 110 per cent of GDP in the second quarter of 2017 — the first time that threshold had been breached since the debt build-up of the mid-2000s. The milestone was arithmetically significant and symbolically important for a government that had built its economic credibility on the promise of debt reduction. The Bank of Jamaica noted in its June monetary policy statement that the declining debt ratio was having the expected effects on Jamaica’s sovereign risk premium — spreads on the island’s US dollar bonds had narrowed, and the domestic Treasury bill yield curve had shifted downward, reducing the cost of new domestic borrowing. Lower borrowing costs freed fiscal space that could be redirected to capital and social spending without expanding the deficit.
What This Means
The second quarter of 2017 provided the first meaningful evidence that Jamaica’s fiscal discipline could survive the graduation from programme to post-programme status. The primary surplus held. The debt declined. The IMF endorsed the performance. These are not dramatic developments — they are exactly what was supposed to happen, which makes them reassuring rather than surprising. The more consequential question is whether Jamaica can sustain the reform momentum in the areas that the EFF did not fully resolve: productivity growth, economic diversification, private investment in non-tourism sectors, and the quality of public services. The institutional framework is in place. The fiscal space is slowly accumulating. The task for the post-EFF years is to convert that fiscal space into the kind of structural improvement that makes Jamaica’s growth rate durable rather than merely episodic.
The Road Ahead
With the precautionary SBA providing a credibility backstop and the Doing Business ranking improving, Jamaica’s medium-term economic narrative is more constructive than it has been for a decade. The risks are real but manageable: the government’s one-seat parliamentary majority limits its ability to pass major structural reforms; the hurricane season, which runs through November, poses an annual threat to the agriculture and tourism sectors; and the global trade environment — marked by rising protectionism in major markets — presents headwinds for BPO and agricultural exports. Within those constraints, the task is to deploy the fiscal space that has been created by four years of discipline in ways that raise productivity and diversify growth. The infrastructure programme announced in Q2 2017 is a start. But infrastructure alone will not produce the 5 per cent annual growth that Jamaica needs. That will require the kind of private sector investment, skills development, and institutional reform that governments can facilitate but not command.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com
Visit our YouTube Community ↗