Two and a Half Billion Short: The Quarter Jamaica Decided It Needed the IMF

• Government revenues fall J$18 billion short of fiscal projections
• Finance Minister Shaw announces Jamaica will seek IMF programme
• Monthly deficits hit J$2.5 billion despite government spending cuts
• Remittance flows decline thirteen consecutive months as diaspora loses income
• Bauxite and remittance shock strips over US$800 million from economy
• Vision 2030 Housing Sector Plan finalised amid deepening fiscal emergency

The spreadsheets arrived every fortnight on the desk of Jamaica’s Finance Minister. Audley Shaw, a businessman-turned-politician who had promised fiscal discipline when the Jamaica Labour Party swept to power in 2007, was not given to theatrical declarations. But by July 2009, even the composure of a career accountant was being tested by what the numbers were saying.

Revenue was not merely below target. It was collapsing. Tax receipts from international trade — customs duties and general consumption tax on imports — had fallen sharply as companies reduced orders and consumers drew back. Income tax revenues, dependent on employment and profits, were softening in tandem with the broader labour market. The first quarter of the fiscal year, April through June, had produced a deficit the government had not anticipated. July was worse. The monthly shortfall alone reached J$17.8 billion.

By the time Shaw addressed Parliament later that summer, he carried a number that was difficult to present as anything other than alarming: government revenues had fallen approximately J$18 billion below projections since the fiscal year began. Despite cutting J$7 billion from the spending side — a politically uncomfortable exercise that touched capital programmes, public sector employment, and development investments — the arithmetic refused to improve. Monthly deficits were running at J$2.5 billion and showing no signs of narrowing.

The Anatomy of a Shock

The revenue collapse did not arrive without warning. For eighteen months, Jamaica had been absorbing a set of external shocks with no parallel in recent economic history, and by the third quarter of 2009, their cumulative weight had begun to show in the public accounts.

The alumina refineries at Alpart, Ewarton, and Kirkvine had closed in succession beginning in late 2008. Their combined shutdown had severed one of Jamaica’s primary sources of foreign exchange — an industry that had contributed roughly US$700 million annually at its peak. Simultaneously, the remittance flows that sustained hundreds of thousands of Jamaican households were declining for their thirteenth consecutive month. Jamaicans in the United States — construction workers, healthcare aides, hospitality employees — had lost jobs, hours, and income as the American recession deepened. Where remittances had grown at fourteen percent annually between 2000 and 2008, they were now contracting by an average of 13.6 percent month after month. By late 2009, an estimated US$250 million in remittance flows would have been lost since the decline began in October 2008.

The combined shock was enormous. Prime Minister Bruce Golding calculated that bauxite losses and the remittance decline had together stripped more than US$800 million from Jamaica’s economy — in a country whose GDP stood at approximately US$14 billion. This was not a cyclical downturn. It was a structural emergency.

The Decision to Call the IMF

Audley Shaw had spent much of 2009 exploring whether Jamaica could navigate its fiscal crisis without external assistance. The government had tightened domestic borrowing, implemented spending controls, and drawn down reserves. But by the time summer settled over Kingston, the path to self-correction had narrowed to a point where it could no longer be described as viable.

The announcement came in the way such things tend to arrive: not as a dramatic declaration but as a measured statement framed in the language of prudence and partnership. Jamaica would seek a Stand-By Arrangement with the International Monetary Fund. The programme, Shaw indicated, would be valued at approximately US$1.27 billion, to be held at the Bank of Jamaica as balance-of-payments support. It would not, he was careful to say, flow directly into the budget. Its purpose was to defend the foreign exchange reserves that kept the economy supplied with oil, medicines, and the raw materials that Jamaican manufacturers needed to operate.

Negotiations, he acknowledged, would take time. The Fund’s standard requirements — fiscal consolidation targets, structural benchmarks, quarterly reviews — would need to be agreed. Jamaica’s position on the domestic debt, which represented more than three-quarters of the government’s total interest expense, would need to be resolved. The talks that began in earnest that summer would not reach a staff-level agreement for several months yet.

The Debt Beneath the Debt

What made Jamaica’s fiscal situation in the middle of 2009 distinctly precarious was not only the flow problem — the deficit — but the stock problem that lay beneath it. Public debt had accumulated to approximately 129 percent of GDP. But the composition of that debt was, in many ways, more troubling than its size.

Domestic debt accounted for the bulk of Jamaica’s interest payments, consuming more than sixty percent of total non-grant revenues. Much of it was short-term. Nearly forty percent of the domestic debt stock — equivalent to twenty-seven percent of GDP — was due to mature within two years, creating a refinancing cliff of daunting proportions. Every time the government rolled over these obligations, it did so at rates that had spiked dramatically during the financial crisis: by late 2008, domestic interest rates had surged more than five hundred basis points, reaching levels above twenty percent. Each rollover locked in another year of crushing debt service costs.

It was this structure that made the IMF programme not merely desirable but necessary. Without an international anchor — and the confidence signal it would send to domestic creditors — the rollover risk had the potential to become a rollover crisis, with consequences far beyond anything the current deficit could cause on its own.

Tourism: A Complicated Picture

Not every sector was moving in the same direction. Jamaica’s tourism performance offered a more nuanced reading than the fiscal data alone suggested.

Stopover arrivals — the tourists who stay in hotels and inject the most foreign exchange into the economy — had remained resilient. The Jamaica Tourist Board would record 1.83 million stopover visitors for the year, up from 1.76 million in 2008. The summer season showed particular strength, growing 4.5 percent year-on-year. Canadian arrivals surged 22.9 percent, their strengthened dollar and appetite for Caribbean travel making Jamaica an attractive proposition even as American discretionary spending contracted. The US market, representing 64.1 percent of total stopovers, held broadly steady.

But the cruise sector told a different story. Passenger arrivals fell to 922,000 from 1.09 million the prior year, dropping below one million for the first time since 2003. Fewer ships were calling at Jamaican ports, and the pier-dependent economy — craft vendors, excursion operators, taxi drivers — felt it directly. Even as headline arrival figures held up, visitor expenditure per person faced downward pressure from travellers who were spending more carefully. The net contribution of tourism to Jamaica’s foreign exchange position remained positive but weaker than the arrival numbers, taken alone, suggested.

Planning for 2030 in the Eye of the Storm

Inside the Planning Institute of Jamaica‘s offices, a different kind of work was continuing alongside the fiscal emergency. Even as the Finance Ministry grappled with revenue shortfalls that were worsening by the fortnight, the planners charged with implementing Vision 2030 were finalising the sector documents that would translate the national development plan into operational priorities.

In August 2009, the Housing Sector Plan was completed. Its targets were striking in their ambition: Jamaica needed fifteen thousand new housing units per year simply to keep pace with population growth and address the existing deficit. In practice, total housing starts in 2008 had reached only 3,973. The National Housing Trust, which had issued 5,546 mortgages the previous year, was operating well below the pace the plan required. The cost of a single formal unit — between J$3.8 million and J$5 million — placed homeownership beyond the reach of most Jamaicans without NHT financing. Approximately thirty percent of the population lived in squatter settlements, and forty-eight percent lived in conditions that met the technical definition of overcrowding.

That such a plan could be completed in August 2009 — at the precise moment the government was contemplating emergency IMF assistance — said something about the peculiar ambition of the Vision 2030 enterprise. It was a plan designed not for the Jamaica of 2009 but for the Jamaica that Jamaica might become by 2030. The country producing it and the country it described were, for the moment, separated by a very considerable distance.

What This Means

Jamaica’s decision to seek IMF support in the summer of 2009 marks a critical inflection point in the country’s modern economic history. The negotiation now underway is not merely a balance-of-payments arrangement. The programme that emerges will need to create the conditions for a structural transformation of Jamaica’s fiscal position — reducing debt from 129 percent of GDP toward something more sustainable, redesigning the tax base to widen revenue collection, and freeing the fiscal space that Vision 2030 requires if it is to move beyond aspiration.

The stakes are unusually high. Jamaica has been to the Fund before — the country signed its first arrangement with the IMF in 1977 and has returned repeatedly since. The historical record of those programmes is mixed: adjustment was often achieved at considerable social cost, but growth did not reliably follow. The conditions the Fund is expected to demand this time — tighter primary surpluses, restructuring of the domestic debt, comprehensive public sector reform — are more ambitious than most of what came before.

Outlook

The negotiations are expected to be complex and protracted. The Fund‘s standard requirements will need to be adapted to Jamaica’s particular circumstances: a debt structure heavily weighted toward short-term domestic obligations, a fragile financial system still absorbing the shocks of 2008, and a government navigating intense political pressures at home. The JLP administration’s parliamentary majority is narrow. The Opposition People’s National Party, led by Portia Simpson Miller, has not committed to supporting whatever the IMF ultimately demands. The months ahead will require not only fiscal arithmetic but political leadership of a kind that Jamaican governments have not always demonstrated.

And yet the sector plans continue to accumulate. The Vision 2030 targets are set. Whether the country that is currently borrowing to service its debts can also become the country those plans envision — prosperous, productive, formally housed, educated beyond its colonial inheritance — remains the central question of Jamaican public life. This quarter, the distance between those two Jamaicas is wider than it has been at any point in recent memory. The question that the coming months will answer is whether the programme now being negotiated in Kingston and Washington can begin to close it.

Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com