The Pipeline Fills: Q1 2014 and the Return of North Coast Hotel Investment

Briefing

• Multiple north coast hotel projects formally announced or broke ground in early 2014.
• Portland Bight Protected Area faced renewed development pressure from infrastructure proposals.
• Planning applications up significantly year-on-year compared to 2012 and 2013.
• Environmental groups raised concerns about EIA quality for fast-tracked applications.

The return of hotel investment to Jamaica’s north coast in 2014 was not sudden. The projects that broke ground or were formally announced in the first quarter of that year had in most cases been in preparation for years, with developers who had paused during the 2008–2012 period of constrained international financing now moving forward as credit conditions eased and occupancy rates at existing properties recovered to levels that made new supply viable. The investment pipeline, in other words, had been filling for several years. But 2014 was the quarter when a critical mass of that pipeline moved from preparation to visible action — from applications and approvals to groundbreakings and construction fences.

The planning system’s response to this surge was uneven. Applications that had been in process for years moved forward efficiently; new applications, submitted in the expectation of quick processing, encountered the same institutional constraints that had always applied. Environmental Impact Assessment requirements had not been relaxed, and the environmental assessment community — the consultants who produce EIAs and the NEPA officers who review them — had not grown in capacity proportionally with the new application load. The result was a bottleneck at the EIA stage, and pressure on both sides of the assessment process to move more quickly than a thorough review would permit.

Portland Bight Under Pressure

The Portland Bight Protected Area, Jamaica’s largest protected area and a UNESCO biosphere reserve covering roughly 1,800 square kilometres of coastal and marine habitat across Clarendon and St Catherine parishes, faced a different kind of development pressure in 2014. Not resort development — the biosphere designation provided meaningful protection against that — but infrastructure proposals associated with the development of the Kingston Freeport Terminal and associated logistics zones on the protected area’s western boundary. The question of where legitimate infrastructure development ended and prohibited encroachment on the protected area began was genuinely contested, and the Portland Bight Protection and Management Authority found itself navigating between development imperatives that had strong political support and conservation obligations that were legally binding.

The EIA Quality Question

The concern raised by environmental groups about the quality of Environmental Impact Assessments for fast-tracked coastal development applications was not new in 2014 — it had been a recurring theme in Jamaican coastal governance for at least a decade — but it gained new urgency as the volume of applications increased. The core argument was that EIAs for coastal resort developments frequently underestimated cumulative impacts, failed to adequately model post-construction coastal sediment dynamics, and treated baseline conditions as static when evidence from existing developed stretches of coastline suggested that the baseline was itself changing rapidly under the cumulative effect of development already approved. Without a credible cumulative impact assessment framework, approvals granted individually and apparently satisfying environmental standards could collectively produce outcomes that no individual assessment had predicted or that any individual applicant could be held responsible for.

Related: Property Market Analysis | Latest Jamaica News

Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com