- The Property (Rights of Spouses) Act applies only to married spouses, not common law partners.
- Common law partners who contribute to property acquisition may have equitable claims under trust law.
- The Intestates’ Estates and Property Charges Act gives some rights to common law partners on intestacy.
- Fraudsters have exploited common law partners’ uncertain rights to transfer property without their consent.
- Common law couples should consider formalising their property arrangements through co-ownership or a will.
Common law unions are a pervasive feature of Jamaican family life, and many couples in such unions own or occupy property together for years or decades without any formal documentation of their respective interests. The legal framework governing property rights in common law unions is materially less protective than that applicable to married couples. The Property (Rights of Spouses) Act — which provides married spouses with presumptive rights to a share of the family home regardless of who holds the legal title — does not apply to common law partners. A common law partner who has contributed to the acquisition or improvement of property held in the other partner’s sole name must establish their claim through the principles of resulting or constructive trusts, which require evidence of a common intention that the contributing partner would have an interest, and evidence of contributions made in reliance on that intention. This is a significantly more difficult legal hurdle to clear than the provisions available to married spouses.

Fraud and Exploitation of Common Law Partners’ Uncertain Rights
The uncertain nature of common law partners’ property rights has been exploited in several ways. A sole registered owner in a common law union who decides to sell or mortgage the property may do so without the consent of their partner, since unlike a married spouse, the common law partner has no automatic veto over dealings with property held in the other partner’s name. This is particularly significant where the contributing partner’s financial contributions are not documented and where they have no independent legal advice. In cases of relationship breakdown, the registered owner partner has in some instances sought to transfer or mortgage the property quickly before the other partner can take any protective steps. The lack of awareness of the legal position on the part of many common law partners makes this form of exploitation particularly effective.
Protecting Property Rights in Common Law Relationships
Common law couples who wish to protect both partners’ interests in property should consider several options. Co-ownership — registering the property in both partners’ names as joint tenants or tenants in common — is the most straightforward way to give both parties formal legal title. Where one partner will hold title alone, the other can protect their equitable interest by having it acknowledged in a written agreement and, where possible, by lodging a caution or caveat at the NLA. Both partners should make wills dealing with their respective interests in property, since the intestacy rules — even as modified by the Intestates’ Estates and Property Charges Act, which provides some rights to common law partners — may not reflect what the partners would have wished. Legal advice from an attorney is strongly recommended for any couple in a common law union who own or are planning to acquire property together.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com


Visit our YouTube Community ↗