Jamaica Economic Intelligence | Q1 2024 | January–March 2024
Key Findings
- The Federal Reserve holds rates at 5.25–5.50 percent through Q1 as US CPI data reverses its Q4 2023 progress — January’s 3.4 percent gives way to a March reading of 3.5 percent — producing the “last mile” inflation stall that forces financial markets to reprice from the six or more rate cuts they had priced for 2024 at year-open to one or two by quarter-end, a repricing that moves long-duration asset valuations globally
- NY Community Bancorp discloses surprise provisions for commercial real estate losses in late January, its stock falling more than 60 percent in two days, briefly reigniting the regional banking stress narrative that the Bank Term Funding Program had contained a year prior; the episode is contained but highlights the CRE sector’s mounting distress as office vacancy rates and hotel refinancing pressures accumulate under the weight of the “higher for longer” rate environment
- The Federal Reserve’s Bank Term Funding Program — the emergency lending facility established in the weekend following Silicon Valley Bank’s March 2023 collapse — is discontinued on March 11, 2024, its one-year anniversary, as the Fed judges that the banking sector’s liquidity position no longer requires the extraordinary support the facility had provided; the discontinuation marks the formal end of the 2023 banking crisis containment period
- The Bank of Japan raises its policy rate for the first time since 2007 on March 19, ending eight years of negative interest rate policy in a decision that signals the global zero-rate era’s definitive conclusion and begins unwinding the yen carry trade dynamics that have shaped global capital flows for a decade
- Super Tuesday on March 5 effectively confirms Donald Trump as the Republican presidential nominee, setting up a Biden-Trump rematch that will define the US policy uncertainty environment through 2024’s election season — with trade, immigration, fiscal, and geopolitical policy implications that Jamaica’s tourism sector, diaspora, and external financing environment will all navigate
- Jamaica’s winter 2024 season delivers arrival data consistent with the structural baseline that 2023’s record year established, with advance booking patterns and Q1 stopover volumes confirming that the recovery’s confirmation in summer 2023 has carried into the winter season the series identified as the critical next durability test
It is the last week of March 2024. The Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge — the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index — will print at 2.5 percent for February when it is released in the coming days, further above the 2 percent target than the market had priced when January opened with futures contracts implying six or more rate cuts by December. The rate cut that was supposed to arrive in March did not arrive. The one pencilled in for May is looking unlikely. The financial market’s 2024 opened with an exuberance about the rate cycle’s end that the first quarter’s data has systematically unwound: inflation is declining, but the last mile is proving exactly as difficult as the Fed had warned and the market had chosen not to believe. In Jamaica, the winter season that was supposed to test whether summer 2023’s record would prove structural or a peak is providing its answer: the bookings held, the arrivals are confirming, and the question the series has been asking since 2021 — whether the recovery was a rebound or a new baseline — is accumulating another quarter of affirmative evidence.
The Last Mile: When the Market Met the Fed’s Guidance
The Federal Reserve spent the second half of 2023 delivering a consistent message: rates would remain at their terminal level until inflation had returned convincingly toward the 2 percent target, and the pace of rate cuts when they arrived would be data-dependent rather than predetermined. The market spent the second half of 2023 not quite believing it. By January 1, 2024, fed funds futures were pricing six or more rate cuts across the calendar year — a pace of easing consistent with an economy heading into recession, not one growing above 2 percent with unemployment below 4 percent. The gap between what the Fed was saying and what the market was pricing was, in retrospect, the clearest statement of what the first quarter would deliver: a collision between optimism and data.
January’s CPI print of 3.4 percent year-over-year — above the 3.2 percent that economists had expected — was the first collision. February’s reading of 3.2 percent, against an expected 3.1 percent, was the second. March’s reading of 3.5 percent — higher than both the prior month and economists’ forecasts — was the definitive statement: inflation’s last mile, the distance between current readings and the 2 percent target, was not going to be covered at the pace the market had priced. The shelter component of CPI remained persistently elevated, running above 5 percent year-over-year, reflecting the lag between actual rental market conditions and the CPI methodology’s measurement of them — a lag the Fed’s models had predicted and the market had consistently underestimated. Supercore inflation — services prices excluding shelter, the metric the Fed had identified as the most reliable real-time indicator of underlying inflation’s direction — was also proving stickier than expected.
The market’s repricing from six cuts to two cuts across Q1 2024 was not disorderly — the equity markets ended the quarter near all-time highs, reflecting an economy whose growth and earnings were strong enough to absorb the higher-for-longer rate environment without the recession the 2022 yield curve inversion had predicted. But the repricing was consequential for long-duration assets: the 10-year Treasury yield, which had fallen from its October 2023 high of 5 percent to around 3.85 percent at year-end on rate cut optimism, climbed back above 4.3 percent by quarter-end as the inflation data revised the expected rate path higher. For Jamaica, this meant the external borrowing cost environment that had appeared to be decisively easing at year-end 2023 had only partially eased — a recalibration with implications for the sovereign debt refinancing assumptions and development financing costs that 2024’s investment plans had been built on.
NYCB and the Commercial Real Estate Reckoning
NY Community Bancorp had spent the year following its acquisition of Signature Bank’s assets in March 2023 appearing to be the beneficiary of the banking crisis rather than its next casualty. Its Q4 2023 earnings release on January 31, 2024 changed that narrative immediately: the bank disclosed unexpected provisions for commercial real estate loan losses and cut its dividend by 71 percent, sending the stock down more than 60 percent in two trading sessions in the worst bank stock collapse since the SVB episode a year prior. The magnitude of the market reaction reflected not just concerns about NYCB specifically but about the exposure category it had flagged: commercial real estate, and particularly the office and multifamily segments that had accumulated the most stress from the combined effects of the “higher for longer” rate environment and the structural demand shifts — remote work’s persistence in the case of office, construction cost escalation in the case of multifamily — that the pandemic had accelerated.
The NYCB episode was the most visible expression of a systemic stress that the regional banking sector had been accumulating since the 2022–2023 rate cycle began. Commercial real estate loans — concentrated in regional and community banks, which lack the diversification and capital buffers of money-centre institutions — had been originated at 2021’s near-zero rate environment and underwritten on 2021’s assumptions about office demand, cap rates, and refinancing terms. The higher-for-longer rate environment that the Q1 2024 inflation data was cementing meant that those loans, maturing through 2024 and 2025, would be refinanced at rates materially higher than the original underwriting had assumed — or would not be refinanced at all, producing the default and loss recognition cycle that NYCB’s provisions had begun to preview. The BTFP’s March 2024 discontinuation made the timing particularly pointed: the emergency backstop that had contained 2023’s banking stress was being removed precisely as the banking sector’s CRE exposure was coming into clearer focus.
For Jamaica’s development financing environment, the CRE sector stress in the United States was a background condition rather than a direct transmission. Jamaica’s resort hospitality sector — hotels, villas, all-inclusive resorts — is financed through a combination of domestic commercial credit, NHT participation, development finance institutions, and foreign direct investment; it is not directly exposed to the US regional bank CRE credit cycle in the way that a US commercial office developer would be. But the indirect transmission channels operated: international development finance institutions whose capital is allocated across multiple markets reprice risk when the global CRE environment deteriorates; foreign direct investment flows to Caribbean resort development compete with distressed US real estate assets whose prices, when they eventually correct, may attract capital that would otherwise seek international development opportunities; and the broader risk-off tone that regional banking stress introduces affects the appetite for cross-border capital deployment generally. The Q1 2024 CRE reckoning was not Jamaica’s crisis, but Jamaica’s development financing environment was not fully insulated from its effects.
The BTFP’s End and Japan’s New Era
The Federal Reserve’s announcement that the Bank Term Funding Program would not be renewed beyond its March 11, 2024 expiration was, in one reading, a routine policy normalisation: an emergency facility established to contain a specific crisis, wound down when the crisis had passed. In another reading, it marked the formal conclusion of the zero-rate era’s emergency architecture — the last of the extraordinary liquidity provisions that had characterised monetary policy since 2020 was being withdrawn, and the banking sector was being returned to the pre-pandemic framework of conventional liquidity provision through the discount window. Banks that had relied on the BTFP’s par-value collateral provision to manage their unrealised Treasury losses had a year in which to adjust; the Fed judged that adjustment to be sufficient.
Eight days later, on March 19, the Bank of Japan removed the final pillar of the global zero-rate era: the negative interest rate policy it had maintained since February 2016, and the yield curve control framework that had suppressed Japanese government bond yields for seven years, were both discontinued. The BOJ raised its policy rate from minus 0.1 percent to a range of 0 to 0.1 percent — a technically modest move whose symbolic significance was large: for the first time since 2007, Japan had positive interest rates. The decision reflected the BOJ’s assessment that Japan had achieved a virtuous cycle of wage growth and price increases that made the extraordinary stimulus of negative rates no longer necessary — an assessment rooted in the spring 2024 wage negotiations (Shunto), in which Japanese corporations agreed to the largest pay increases in three decades.
The Japan rate decision’s global significance was primarily channelled through the yen carry trade — the decades-long practice of borrowing in yen at near-zero rates and investing in higher-yielding assets globally. A reduction in that carry trade’s profitability, as Japanese rates rise and the yen’s implied depreciation trajectory shifts, affects capital flows across every asset class and geography. For emerging markets and small open economies like Jamaica, a partial unwinding of the yen carry trade means a reallocation of global capital toward Japanese assets and away from the higher-yield destinations the carry trade had been funding — a headwind to the foreign direct investment and external financing flows that supplement Jamaica’s domestic capital base. The BOJ’s move was measured enough that the immediate effect was contained; the medium-term implication, as Japan’s normalisation continues, is a global capital flow environment that is less uniformly accommodative to emerging market and Caribbean financing needs than the zero-rate era had been.
Trump, the Election Horizon, and Jamaica’s US Policy Exposure
Super Tuesday on March 5, 2024 produced the result that polling and primary results through January and February had made inevitable: Donald Trump won every contested primary state in the day’s voting, effectively ending whatever residual possibility Nikki Haley’s continued candidacy had represented and confirming that November’s election would be a Biden-Trump rematch. The significance for Jamaica’s economic planning was not in the partisan framing of the choice — the series makes no endorsements and draws no party preference — but in the policy uncertainty that a contested election between two candidates with materially different positions on trade, immigration, fiscal policy, and international engagement introduces into every economic planning assumption that has a US policy dependency.
Jamaica’s exposure to US policy runs through multiple channels, each with different sensitivities to the electoral outcome. Tourism demand is primarily driven by American consumer income, employment and confidence rather than US policy — it is largely insulated from the specific policy choices of the administration in power. Remittances are more sensitive: immigration enforcement posture, visa and work authorisation policy, and the regulatory environment for money transfer operators all affect the diaspora’s capacity and willingness to send money home in ways that policy choices can meaningfully alter. Trade policy — particularly the trade preference frameworks under which Jamaican goods access the US market, and the tariff environment that affects inputs Jamaica imports from the US — has a more direct fiscal and production impact. And the geopolitical posture of the US toward multilateral institutions whose lending Jamaica accesses — the IMF, the IDB, the World Bank — is not independent of who wins in November.
The Q1 2024 significance of the election horizon was its introduction into planning assumptions rather than its immediate economic effect: business investments with long payback periods, development projects with multi-year timelines, and sovereign debt management strategies that extend beyond November all now carried an additional layer of US policy uncertainty that the previous four years of relatively predictable US engagement had not required Jamaica to discount. That uncertainty, for Q1, was a planning variable rather than a measured cost — but the series noted it as the quarter in which it became impossible to assess Jamaica’s medium-term economic environment without accounting for the US electoral outcome’s potential range.
Winter 2024: The Durability Test Passed
The Jamaica Tourist Board’s Q1 2024 stopover data confirmed what the advance booking patterns through November and December had suggested: the winter 2024 season — covering the December-through-March peak months that generate the highest per-visitor spending of Jamaica’s tourism calendar — was delivering arrival and occupancy performance consistent with the 2023 structural baseline rather than a post-record correction. The significance of this confirmation extended beyond the specific numbers: the durability test that the series had identified as the logical follow-on to summer 2023’s arrival record was the question of whether a recovery that had built across three years of summer seasons could also sustain the winter performance that the pre-pandemic record had been built on.
The answer through Q1 was affirmative. The major resort corridors — Montego Bay, Negril, Ocho Rios — reported occupancy rates in the winter peak months that were consistent with the prior year’s strong performance. The US consumer’s resilience, which the Q1 economic data was confirming through continued spending and employment strength despite the “higher for longer” rate environment, was the primary demand engine: Americans were still travelling to Jamaica at volumes and with per-trip spending that maintained the revenue performance the 2023 record had established. The student loan repayment resumption that the Q3 2023 review had flagged as a potential demand headwind had not, through Q1 2024’s data, produced the spending reduction in travel that the household budget arithmetic had suggested might materialise.
The Bank of Jamaica‘s rate cuts — the easing cycle that had begun in Q4 2023 continued through Q1 2024, with additional reductions in the policy rate that were beginning to transmit into the NHT and commercial mortgage rates that Jamaica’s property market prices against — were adding a domestic demand tailwind to the external tourism engine. The hospitality workforce whose employment had been sustained through four years of recovery and whose nominal wages had been growing was beginning to access financing terms that the tightening cycle’s peak had made inaccessible: NHT mortgage qualification calculations that had been constrained by rates near their cycle high were now improving with each BOJ cut. The property market entering Q2 2024 was the first quarter in which the full combination of the structural recovery’s demand conditions — sustained employment, growing wages, declining borrowing costs — were simultaneously in place.
What This Means
Homeowners enter Q2 2024 in a property market where the BOJ’s easing cycle is real but the transmission is gradual. Each quarter-point cut in the policy rate takes months to reach the NHT’s mortgage terms and the commercial banks’ variable-rate portfolios; the homeowner watching for rate relief is watching a mechanism that moves slowly even when the direction is clear. The global “higher for longer” recalibration that Q1’s US inflation data produced does not directly affect the BOJ’s domestic rate path — Jamaica’s easing is driven by domestic inflation data, which continues moving toward the 4–6 percent target band — but it does affect the external financing cost baseline against which Jamaica’s sovereign debt is priced, and by extension the fiscal space that determines how aggressively the government can support homeownership financing programs like NHT. The homeowner’s Q2 position is: better than Q1, improving trajectory, patience required.
Renters in Jamaica’s resort parishes are entering the quarter where the recovery’s three-year accumulation of employment stability and wage growth is most visible in the household budget. The tourism season that has just concluded delivered employment continuity through the peak winter months; the BOJ’s rate cuts are improving the NHT affordability math; and the inflation deceleration that the BOJ’s tightening cycle achieved means that nominal wage gains are now translating into real purchasing power rather than being eroded by price increases. The renter’s Q2 question is the same structural challenge it has been throughout the recovery: affordability. Property prices in resort-adjacent communities have risen through four years of demand recovery in ways that have outpaced wage gains even as they improved; the NHT’s contribution ceiling and the commercial banks’ debt-service ratio requirements mean that many renters who have sustained employment through the recovery cannot yet qualify for the mortgage financing that would convert that employment stability into ownership. The rate cycle’s easing helps at the margin; it does not resolve the underlying affordability gap.
Developers reading Q1 2024 are processing the global “higher for longer” recalibration against the domestic easing cycle backdrop — a combination that is more nuanced than either the optimism of year-end 2023 or the caution of mid-2023. The domestic financing environment is improving: each BOJ cut reduces the carrying cost of development loans and improves the buyer qualification math that underpins presale programs. The external financing environment has partially reversed the improvement that the October 2023 10-year Treasury decline had produced: yields are back above 4.3 percent, and the international capital that supplements domestic development financing prices against that benchmark. The net position for the developer entering Q2 2024 is: domestic conditions clearly improving, external conditions still elevated but stable, demand confirmed, project pipeline viable. The CRE stress in the US regional banking sector is a monitoring item for developers with international financing relationships; it is not yet a direct constraint on Jamaica-specific project financing for well-underwritten hospitality assets with confirmed occupancy track records.
Businesses across Jamaica are operating in an environment where the revenue confirmation of the past two years is meeting the cost normalisation that the commodity shock’s dissipation has produced — but where the “higher for longer” global rate environment is extending the period of elevated business financing costs beyond what Q4 2023’s rate cut optimism had suggested. Operating businesses with existing facilities and established customer relationships are in a strong position: revenue solid, energy costs normalised, supply chain premiums resolved, BOJ easing underway. Businesses seeking growth capital — expansion financing, working capital lines at larger scale, acquisition financing — are navigating a lending environment where the commercial banks’ cost of funds remains elevated by the cycle’s legacy even as the BOJ’s direction has turned. The rate cut transmission to commercial lending rates is real but lagged, and Q1’s data suggests the lag will extend further into 2024 than the market had anticipated.
Diaspora Jamaicans in the United States are navigating an election year whose opening quarter has clarified the partisan choice without resolving the policy uncertainty it represents. The aggregate US economic picture remains favourable for diaspora workers in the median employment category: unemployment historically low, real wages positive, consumer spending strong. The technology sector disruption that has disproportionately affected college-educated diaspora workers in professional roles continued through Q1 — major corporations across technology, financial services, and media announced additional rounds of workforce rationalisation — but aggregate re-employment rates have remained sufficient to prevent the disruption from producing aggregate income reduction in remittance-sending cohorts. The Trump nomination’s confirmation has introduced immigration policy uncertainty that affects diaspora workers with more tenuous legal status; the specific implications depend on November’s outcome and the policy choices the next administration makes, both of which remain uncertain through Q1.
Outlook
Q2 2024 will be shaped by the resolution — or continued deferral — of the US rate cut question. If the April and May inflation data confirms March’s reacceleration, the Fed’s first cut slides further into the second half and potentially into Q4; if April’s data shows the March print was transitory noise, the June cut that the market is tentatively pricing returns to plausibility. The uncertainty itself has become a market condition: volatility in rate expectations is transmitting into volatility in every asset class priced against the risk-free rate, and businesses and governments that need to make long-duration financing decisions are making them against a moving benchmark.
For Jamaica, Q2 brings the summer booking season’s early data — the advance reservations for July and August that will indicate whether the 2024 summer is shaping up to match 2023’s record or is showing the normalisation that post-record years often produce. The BOJ’s easing timeline will be the domestic planning variable: each cut that arrives ahead of schedule is a direct improvement in the NHT and mortgage financing terms that the property market and its supply chain depend on. The US election’s policy uncertainty will be the background condition against which every medium-term planning assumption is made — present, but not yet resolving in either direction.
The CRE stress that NYCB’s January disclosure put on the radar will develop through Q2 in ways that will either confirm or moderate the systemic concern the episode introduced. If the regional bank CRE losses remain idiosyncratic — concentrated in institutions with specific exposure concentrations — the episode will be remembered as the cycle’s echo rather than its next chapter. If the loss disclosures spread to a broader set of regional institutions, the banking sector stress narrative that the BTFP had contained may require a new containment chapter. The Q1 data did not resolve this question; it posed it clearly enough that Q2’s bank earnings season will be read with a specificity about CRE exposure that prior quarters had not required.
Jamaica Economic Intelligence is an independent data-driven journalism series tracking Jamaica’s economic performance across the housing, tourism, fiscal and monetary sectors. Historical data drawn from Bank of Jamaica, Statistical Institute of Jamaica, International Monetary Fund and Jamaica Tourist Board publications. This report covers Q1 2024: January–March 2024.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com
Visit our YouTube Community ↗