• GDP grows 0.9% — the third consecutive year of expansion under the IMF Extended Fund Facility
• Public debt falls sharply to 121.9% of GDP — the largest single-year reduction in Jamaica’s modern economic history
• Inflation falls to 3.7% — a historic low, driven by the collapse in global oil prices and exchange rate stabilisation
• Tourism reaches 2.12 million arrivals and US$2,401 million in receipts, setting new records
• Falling energy costs ease pressure on private sector competitiveness for the first time in years
• The EFF programme remains on track as Jamaica prepares for a new Precautionary arrangement with the IMF

The Dividend: Jamaica in 2015

The long walk of 2014 reached a landing in 2015 that few had predicted with such speed: a debt ratio that fell by more than fifteen percentage points in a single year, inflation that collapsed to levels not seen in a generation, and an economy that — still growing slowly — was beginning to feel, at last, the structural benefits of the discipline it had imposed on itself. The collapse in global oil prices, which began in the second half of 2014 and accelerated through 2015, provided Jamaica with an unexpected external dividend precisely when the internal effort of adjustment had begun to take hold. The combination was not enough to declare victory. But it was enough to begin, cautiously, to believe that the arithmetic was working.

GDP at 0.9 Per Cent: The Third Consecutive Year

Jamaica’s economy grew by 0.9 per cent in 2015 — the third consecutive year of positive growth and the strongest expansion since the global financial crisis. The growth reflected a broadening of the economy’s productive base: services continued to lead, with tourism, financial services and business process outsourcing all performing well, but the goods-producing sectors also showed improvement. Agriculture recovered from the drought conditions that had suppressed output in previous years. Mining staged a modest revival as global aluminium markets stabilised. The construction sector, which had been contracting under fiscal adjustment, began to respond to the improved credit conditions that lower inflation and lower interest rates were enabling.

The 0.9 per cent growth rate was still well below Jamaica’s potential. Economists working from the island’s factor endowments, its educational attainment, its geographic position and its diaspora connections consistently estimated a potential growth rate of 3 to 4 per cent — a rate that, if sustained, would transform the standard of living of the average Jamaican within a generation. The gap between actual and potential growth was the lasting legacy of the debt overhang, the energy cost burden and the structural impediments — crime, slow courts, complex land administration, inadequate infrastructure — that constrained productive investment even in a more stable macroeconomic environment. Three consecutive years of growth were encouraging. They were not yet transformative.

The labour market was beginning, tentatively, to respond to the improved growth environment. The unemployment rate, which had been elevated for most of the period since 2008, edged down as the services sector expanded and the BPO industry in particular added jobs. Youth unemployment remained significantly above the headline rate — a structural feature of the Jamaican labour market that reflected both the mismatch between the skills that the education system produced and the skills that employers required, and the difficulty that young workers without established work histories faced in demonstrating their reliability to risk-averse employers operating in an environment of thin margins.

Three consecutive years of growth in an economy that had not managed three consecutive years of growth in a decade is not a trend — it is the beginning of the possibility of a trend, which is a different and considerably more fragile thing.

Debt Plunges to 121.9 Per Cent: A Historic Reduction

Jamaica’s public debt ratio fell from 137.9 per cent of GDP in 2014 to 121.9 per cent in 2015 — a reduction of sixteen percentage points in a single year, the largest annual decline in Jamaica’s modern economic history. The fall was the product of several converging forces. The primary surplus of 7.5 per cent was maintained through the full year, as it had been through 2013 and 2014 — meaning that the government continued to collect more in non-interest revenue than it spent on non-interest expenditure, with the surplus applied directly to reducing the debt principal. The GDP denominator was growing modestly, which reduced the ratio even as the absolute debt stock declined. And the lower interest rate environment created by the programme’s success was reducing the cost of rolling over existing debt as it matured, improving the debt dynamics at the margin.

The scale of the reduction also reflected methodological and statistical revisions that periodically affect debt ratio calculations. Regardless of how the precise arithmetic was divided between primary surpluses, growth effects and statistical adjustments, the direction was unmistakable and the magnitude unprecedented in recent Jamaican fiscal history. A debt ratio of 121.9 per cent was still far above any level that could be described as comfortable — it still implied that a very large share of government revenues was committed to debt service — but the trajectory was now steep enough that the destination of sustainable debt was becoming, for the first time, a near-term rather than a distant theoretical possibility.

The IMF’s assessment of Jamaica’s programme performance through 2015 was consistently positive. The Economic Programme Oversight Committee continued its quarterly monitoring, and the convergence of domestic accountability with international programme reporting created a discipline of public transparency that reinforced the government’s commitment to the fiscal path. The prospect that Jamaica would, on completing the EFF in 2017, move to a Precautionary arrangement — one in which the IMF’s financial support was available but not drawn upon, providing a backstop rather than a lifeline — began to seem credible rather than aspirational.

Inflation at 3.7 Per Cent: Oil’s Gift

Consumer price inflation fell to 3.7 per cent in 2015 — a historic low, and a transformation from the 8.3 per cent of 2014 that reflected both the discipline of the programme and the extraordinary external gift of the global oil price collapse. Brent crude, which had been trading above US$100 per barrel through much of 2013 and 2014, fell through the floor in the second half of 2014 and continued declining through 2015, reaching levels below US$50 per barrel that had not been seen since before the commodity supercycle of the mid-2000s. For a country that imported the majority of its energy and a significant share of its food in energy-intensive supply chains, the effect was powerful and immediate.

The Bank of Jamaica was able, in the lower inflation environment, to reduce its policy interest rate — a transmission that worked through the commercial banking system to lower the cost of credit to businesses and households. Lower borrowing costs, combined with greater economic stability, began to unlock investment that had been deferred through the years of uncertainty. The construction sector, in particular, responded: the pipeline of NHT housing schemes advanced, private developers found it marginally easier to access project finance, and the incremental household construction that had been stalled by the combination of inflation and high interest rates began to resume in communities across the island.

The fall in inflation also provided, for the first time in several years, the possibility of real wage growth for Jamaican workers. When prices are rising at 8 or 9 per cent, nominal wage increases of 5 or 6 per cent represent a real pay cut — workers are nominally earning more but effectively purchasing less. At 3.7 per cent inflation, even modest nominal wage increases could translate into genuine improvements in purchasing power. This mattered not only for household welfare but for domestic demand — the component of GDP growth that is driven by the spending of Jamaican households rather than by exports and tourism receipts.

When the price of oil falls by half, a country that imports its energy does not merely save on fuel bills — it regains, across every sector of its economy, a portion of the productive capacity that expensive energy had been consuming.

Energy Costs Ease: The Competitiveness Shift

The collapse in oil prices transformed Jamaica’s energy cost environment more rapidly than any policy intervention could have achieved. Electricity tariffs, which had been among the highest in the Caribbean and a persistent competitive handicap for Jamaican businesses, fell as the underlying fuel cost that drove generation dropped sharply. Manufacturers who had been absorbing electricity bills that made their products difficult to price competitively found their margins improving without any change in their operational efficiency. Hotels and resorts, which consumed energy at scale for air conditioning, pools, kitchens and laundry, saw their operating cost structures ease in ways that improved their financial performance and, in some cases, their ability to invest in refurbishment.

The energy cost easing also came at a structurally important moment for Jamaica’s transition to renewable generation. The government had been working to diversify the energy mix through investments in wind and solar capacity, and the fiscal space created by the programme’s debt reduction was beginning to support those investments. The irony of falling oil prices — which temporarily reduced the financial urgency of the renewable transition by making fossil fuel generation cheaper — was not lost on energy policy analysts, who noted that building renewable capacity during a period of low oil prices was strategically sound precisely because the long-term case for diversification did not depend on oil remaining at US$100 per barrel.

Tourism: 2.12 Million Arrivals

Jamaica’s tourism sector recorded 2.12 million arrivals in 2015 and receipts of US$2,401 million — both new records, and a confirmation that the 2013 milestone of 2 million arrivals had established a new baseline from which the sector was continuing to grow. The growth reflected the sustained investment in airlift, resort capacity and destination marketing that the tourism sector had been making consistently since the mid-2000s, as well as the continuing strength of Jamaica’s brand among its core visitor markets.

The lower energy costs of 2015 had a particular effect on the tourism sector’s economics. All-inclusive resorts, which operate high-consumption facilities at scale, are among the most energy-intensive businesses in Jamaica’s economy. The reduction in electricity costs improved their profit margins in a year when room rate growth was modest and visitor numbers, while growing, were not growing at the rates that would have offset energy savings through volume alone. The improved margins translated, in some cases, into reinvestment in the resort product — refurbishments, new amenities, infrastructure upgrades — that would sustain the sector’s competitiveness in subsequent years.

The meeting and conference segment of Jamaica’s tourism market continued to develop in 2015, with Kingston increasingly positioning itself as a venue for regional and international events. The Montego Bay Convention Centre was drawing international conferences and business meetings that brought higher-spending visitors with different consumption patterns than leisure tourists. Diaspora events — family reunions, cultural festivals, homecoming celebrations — also contributed to visitor volumes and spending in ways that the aggregate statistics did not fully capture, since diaspora visitors often stayed with family rather than in commercial accommodation, reducing their recorded tourism expenditure while adding to the informal economy of the communities they visited.

Housing: The Affordability Window Opens

The National Housing Trust entered 2015 in a better operating environment than it had faced since before the global financial crisis. Lower interest rates reduced the cost of the Trust’s own borrowing, improving its capacity to fund new scheme development. Lower construction materials costs — partially the result of lower energy prices flowing through the production of cement and steel — reduced the per-unit development cost of new housing schemes. Lower inflation provided some relief to contributors whose real incomes had been squeezed through the adjustment years, potentially improving their creditworthiness and their capacity to service NHT mortgages.

The housing supply challenge was still acute. The accumulated deficit of affordable units — built up over decades of population growth, rural-to-urban migration and inadequate formal housing production — was not going to be resolved in a single year of improved macroeconomic conditions. But 2015 created a window of opportunity for the NHT to accelerate its development pipeline, and there was evidence that the Trust was using that window: new schemes were announced, land acquisitions proceeded, and the planning processes for major developments in communities across the island advanced more quickly than they had in the constrained years of peak fiscal adjustment.

For diaspora Jamaicans, the combination of lower Jamaican dollar interest rates and a more stable macroeconomic environment improved the financial case for the investment in Jamaica that many had been planning for years. The housing construction that diaspora remittances funded — the incremental rooms, the second floors, the family homes built for eventual return — had been paused or slowed during the years of high inflation and currency depreciation. In 2015, with inflation at 3.7 per cent and the exchange rate more stable, the economic rationale for that investment improved, and the flow of diaspora capital into residential construction — never entirely interrupted even in the worst years — began to quicken.

The Legacy Lives On

Marcus Garvey understood that the fruits of discipline are not immediate — that the sacrifices made in one generation are the foundation upon which the next generation builds. The Jamaica of 2015 was, in this sense, beginning to harvest the first tentative fruits of the compact made in 2013. The debt was falling. Inflation was at its lowest in a generation. Growth was sustained for a third year. None of this was comfortable or adequate by the standards of what a people deserved; but all of it pointed, for the first time in years, in the direction of the gradual improvement that sustained discipline had promised but not yet delivered.

The external gift of lower oil prices was a reminder, too, that the international economy is never merely a backdrop to Jamaican decisions — it is an active participant in Jamaica’s economic outcomes, for better and for worse. The same global connections that had transmitted the 2008 financial crisis and the 2009 recession to the island now transmitted the benefits of a commodity price collapse that Jamaica had played no part in producing. Garvey would have recognised the dependence without necessarily accepting it as inevitable. The project of building an economy less exposed to external shocks — through energy diversification, export diversification, the development of domestic productive capacity — remained as relevant in 2015 as it had been in 1920. The tools available for pursuing it were better. The will to use them would be tested in the years ahead.

---

Series note: This is Edition 18 of Marcus Garvey & The Making of Modern Jamaica — an ongoing editorial series examining Jamaica’s social, economic and built environment through an annual lens, from the birth of Marcus Garvey in 1887 to the present day. Edition 1 (1887–1998), Edition 2 (1999), Edition 3 (2000), Edition 4 (2001), Edition 5 (2002), Edition 6 (2003), Edition 7 (2004), Edition 8 (2005), Edition 9 (2006), Edition 10 (2007), Edition 11 (2008), Edition 12 (2009), Edition 13 (2010), Edition 14 (2011), Edition 15 (2012), Edition 16 (2013) and Edition 17 (2014) are available on Jamaica Homes News.

Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com