Anyone who has spent time in church knows how quickly a disagreement can harden into sides. Baptism, music, who may preach: good people pick up their Bibles and hold them like boxing gloves. We are one body, reading one book, and still we manage to act as if we are waiting for the bell.
Families do the same thing, only the ring is usually a dining table and the argument is about land.
Picture it. Grandmother has passed. There is a house in the country with a zinc roof that needs replacing, an acre behind it with a few mango trees, and a title nobody has looked at in years. One sibling lives in Birmingham and wants to sell. One lives ten minutes away, has been paying the light bill and cutting the grass, and feels the place is more hers than anyone’s. A cousin says Grandpa always promised him the back portion. Somebody brings a folder of receipts. Somebody else brings old hurts that have nothing to do with the land at all.
By the end of the evening, voices are raised and a WhatsApp group has gone very quiet.
Abram’s surprising offer
Scripture is not naive about this. In Genesis 13, Abram and his nephew Lot have prospered so much that the land cannot hold both households. Their herdsmen begin to quarrel over grazing and water, the kind of practical, grinding dispute that eats at relationships. Abram’s response is worth reading slowly:
“Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and between my herdmen and thy herdmen; for we be brethren.” (Genesis 13:8, KJV)
Then he does something that must have looked foolish to his workers. As the elder, with every cultural right to choose first, he lets Lot pick. Lot looks out, sees the well-watered plain, and takes it. Abram accepts what is left.
Notice what Abram did not do. He did not pretend there was no problem. He did not insist they all keep living on top of each other for the sake of appearances. He named the conflict, put the relationship above his advantage, and proposed a real, practical separation. The land was divided; the family was not.
What we are actually fighting about
Most church quarrels are not really about the grape juice or the hymn book. They are about being heard, about who belongs, about fear that something precious will be lost. Family property disputes are the same. The sister who kept the house going wants her years of care acknowledged. The brother overseas wants to be treated as family, not as an absentee with an opinion. The cousin wants his grandfather’s word to have mattered.
When we see that, the conversation can change. It becomes possible to say, “You carried this house when the rest of us did not, and that counts,” before anyone mentions a valuation. It becomes possible to ask, “What would feel fair to you?” rather than, “What does the paper say?”
The paper still matters, of course. Peace is not the same as vagueness. A family that loves each other will still want a proper survey, a clear title and an attorney-at-law who can explain the options, because unclear arrangements are often what cause the next generation’s fight. Abram and Lot drew a line on the ground. Clarity can be a kindness.
How good and how pleasant
Psalm 133 opens with a line many of us learned as children: “Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!” (Psalm 133:1, KJV). The psalm goes on to compare that unity to oil running down Aaron’s beard and dew falling on the mountains. Both images are about something that flows downward and spreads. Unity, in other words, is not a static agreement reached once. It is something that runs from one person to the next, usually starting with whoever is willing to go first.
In a family, going first can look small. Phoning the sibling you argued with, not to reopen the case, but to ask about her children. Offering to split the cost of the survey. Admitting that you have not contributed much and would like to. Suggesting that the family pray together before the next meeting, or invite a trusted elder to sit in. None of these settles the question of the land. All of them make it more likely that the question can be settled without a rupture.
Paul urges the church in Ephesus to be “endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3, KJV). Endeavouring is an effortful word. It suggests that unity is kept by work, not by luck, and not by everyone thinking the same thing. That is as true at the family table as it is in the church hall.
For reflection
- Is there a place in your family, over a house, a plot of land or a debt, where you have been holding on to your right to choose first?
- Underneath the practical argument, what does the other person most need to hear from you?
- What one step could you take this week that would let peace flow downward?
Lord, You know the arguments in our families and in our churches, and You know what lies underneath them. Give us Abram’s courage to put people above advantage, and the wisdom to seek clear, fair arrangements that protect the ones who come after us. Let the unity You give run down through our homes like oil and dew. Amen.
This article is general information only and is not financial, legal, tax or other professional advice. Please speak to a qualified professional about your own circumstances.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com
Visit our YouTube Community ↗