- Only 45% of HEART trainees achieved certification in five years.
- $30.5 billion spent without delivering optimal value for money.
- 61% of Jamaica’s workforce lacks vocational or professional certification.
- Auditor General identified serious operational deficiencies within HEART/NSTA.
- Poor inter-agency coordination undermined skills training programme effectiveness.
- Vision 2030 education goals at risk without immediate reform.
Read the full audit report from the Auditor General’s Department →
Jamaica’s primary public skills training agency spent $30.5 billion in public funds over five years yet failed to certify more than half of the people who enrolled in its programmes, a performance audit by the Auditor General has found. With six in ten Jamaican workers still lacking any formal skills credentials during the same period, the findings expose a crisis at the centre of the country’s economic development ambitions and the Vision 2030 commitment to producing a world-class workforce.
For a country whose government has staked its development agenda on producing a globally competitive workforce by 2030, the numbers are sobering. Jamaica’s premier public skills training body, the HEART/National Service Training Agency, spent $30.5 billion in public funds over five financial years — and produced certified graduates from fewer than half the people it trained.

That is the central conclusion of a performance audit conducted by the Auditor General’s Department covering the period 2014-15 to 2018-19. Described formally as a value-for-money examination, the audit set out to answer a direct but consequential question: did Jamaica receive what it paid for from its investment in skills training? The answer, the Auditor General found, was no.
The certification rate across the five-year period reached only 45 percent relative to total enrolment. For every ten people who entered a HEART/NSTA programme, approximately five and a half left without any credential to show for their time. Whether those individuals dropped out, failed assessments, or were failed by systemic weaknesses in how programmes were designed and delivered, the outcome was identical: a generation of predominantly young Jamaicans — the unattached youth the agency was specifically mandated to reach — went through the process and emerged no more formally qualified than when they arrived.
The scale of this failure, measured in public money, is stark. The $30.5 billion drawn from the public purse over those five years did not come from nowhere. It is funded substantially through the HEART Trust Fund, a levy charged to employers at three percent of their payroll. From Kingston manufacturers and Montego Bay resort operators to rural agricultural businesses and small enterprises in every parish, Jamaican employers make that recurring financial contribution in the expectation that the agency will deliver trained, certified workers the economy genuinely needs. The Auditor General’s finding that HEART did not obtain optimal value from that expenditure is a direct indictment of how that expectation was met.
What makes the findings particularly troubling is the context in which HEART operates. Labour force data collected by the Statistical Institute of Jamaica between September 2014 and October 2018 — the same window the audit examined — found that approximately 61 percent of Jamaica’s working-age population lacked any professional or vocational certification. Six in ten workers had no formal skills credentials whatsoever. This is not a marginal gap in a developing system. It is a structural weakness that runs through every sector of the economy, from construction and healthcare to hospitality, manufacturing, and information technology.
That 61 percent figure is precisely the measure of why HEART/NSTA exists. The agency was created and funded to reduce that deficit: to convert untrained young people into certified, employable workers whose capabilities could support national economic growth. When a programme designed to address a 61 percent problem produces certified graduates at a rate of only 45 percent of those enrolled, it is not closing the gap — it is failing to keep pace with the scale of national need.
For ordinary Jamaicans, the consequences extend far beyond any training room. A construction worker in a rural parish without formal certification is less likely to secure employment on regulated building sites or government infrastructure projects. A young woman from a depressed urban community who completes a hospitality training course but leaves without certification finds the doors of formal hotel employment considerably harder to open. The credentials that HEART programmes are designed to deliver are not merely pieces of paper — they are entry tickets to stable employment, incremental wage growth, and the kind of economic participation that sustains households, communities, and the broader national tax base.
The housing sector illustrates the knock-on effect with particular clarity. Jamaica faces a chronic deficit of affordable housing units, and the government’s social housing agenda under agencies including the National Housing Trust depends on an adequate pipeline of certified skilled labour in construction trades — masonry, carpentry, plumbing, electrical work. When the agency charged with producing that pipeline fails to certify more than half of its trainees in those disciplines, it creates a bottleneck in the labour market with direct consequences for how quickly, safely, and affordably homes can be built. The skills gap does not remain contained within the training institution; it ripples outward into road construction, public infrastructure maintenance, school repairs, hospital upgrades, and the delivery of every physical service the government provides.
The Auditor General identified two distinct categories of factors that drove the programme’s underperformance. External constraints — broader economic conditions, labour market dynamics, and pressures beyond HEART’s direct control — played some role. But auditors were explicit that internal operational deficiencies within the agency itself were also responsible. These were failures HEART could have addressed and, the audit implied, did not address with sufficient urgency or rigour. The combination of external headwinds and internal management weaknesses produced an outcome that fell substantially short of what the public’s investment warranted.
The audit’s identification of insufficient coordination between HEART and other government agencies as a contributing problem points to a failure that extends beyond any single organisation. Skills training does not exist in isolation. It intersects with secondary and tertiary education institutions, with social protection services that support youth from vulnerable communities, with industry bodies in sectors from agriculture to manufacturing, and with labour market regulators whose intelligence about employer demand should inform what programmes are offered and how they are structured. When coordination between HEART and those entities is fragmented — when referrals are not made, when industry signals about the credentials employers actually value are not incorporated, when social services fail to support trainees who face the economic barriers that prevent programme completion — the result is precisely the sub-optimal outcome the audit recorded.
There is a structural tension here that the audit surfaces with precision. HEART’s mandate specifically targets unattached youth: young people who are neither in school nor in employment and who represent one of Jamaica’s most persistent social policy challenges. These are exactly the young people whose life circumstances make sustained programme completion most difficult. Financial hardship, family obligations, transportation costs to training centres, and the immediate pressure to earn income all compete with the longer-term benefit of staying enrolled long enough to qualify for certification. If HEART’s operational model fails to account for and actively address those barriers — through stipends, transport support, flexible scheduling, or targeted retention strategies — the agency will systematically reproduce precisely the low certification rates the audit documented, training those easiest to reach while leaving behind those whose need is most acute.
The $30.5 billion documented in this audit was not spent on nothing. Real programmes were delivered, instructors were paid, facilities were maintained, and equipment was purchased. A substantial number of those who enrolled did benefit and did obtain certification. But the audit’s central finding is that the value generated was materially less than what the scale of investment could and should have produced. That gap — between what $30.5 billion could have achieved and what it actually delivered — is the measure of public loss that the Auditor General placed on the public record.
The Auditor General’s recommendations called on HEART/NSTA to address the identified operational deficiencies without delay and to build stronger, more substantive coordination with other government agencies to improve the coherence and reach of skills training delivery. The tone of the audit left no room for gradualism: corrective action was needed immediately. Whether management accepted specific recommendations in full, in part, or conditionally was not exhaustively detailed in the published audit findings, though the urgency conveyed by the Auditor General was unambiguous.
The question of whether those recommendations were implemented — and with what results — is one that Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee, the Ministry of Education and Youth, and the Jamaican public have both the right and the responsibility to press. The audit period ended in 2018-19. The years since have provided ample time for corrective action. Whether the certification rate has risen, whether operational weaknesses have been addressed, and whether inter-agency coordination has been restructured into something more effective than what the audit found are questions that demand current answers, not historical ones.
Vision 2030 Jamaica’s national development plan commits the country to achieving world-class education and training within this decade. That goal, however commendable, cannot be reached on the back of a 45 percent certification rate and an acknowledgment by the Auditor General that billions in public expenditure failed to produce optimal returns. A programme that leaves more than half its trainees without credentials, that absorbs substantial employer and taxpayer funding without delivering commensurate results, and that operates with documented internal weaknesses and inadequate coordination across government, is not positioned to close a gap in which six in ten working Jamaicans still lack formal skills qualifications.
The audit does not suggest the HEART/NSTA programme is beyond remedy. But it makes the distance between current performance and national ambition unmistakably plain. Closing that distance demands more than the acknowledgment of findings. It demands a fundamental rethinking of how the agency defines and measures programme success, how it supports trainees through to the point of certification, how its curriculum reflects actual labour market demand, and how it integrates its operations with the full ecosystem of government services that shape whether a young Jamaican can complete training and enter the workforce as a certified, productive contributor. The 61 percent of the labour force that lacked certification during the audit period did not emerge from a vacuum. They are, in large measure, the accumulated product of a training system that has not yet succeeded at the scale the country requires — and a public audit record that now demands that pattern be reversed.
Jamaica Accountability Watch is an independent editorial series by Jamaica Homes News examining what government audit reports reveal about the management of public money. Source: Auditor General’s Department of Jamaica.
Follow Jamaica Homes on Youtube @jamaicahomes and Instagram @jamaica_homes and on Facebook @jamaicahomesnews Send us a message or email us at onlinefeedback@jamaica-homes.com or editor@jamaica-homes.com


Visit our YouTube Community ↗